"My advocacy is not about me, my advocacy is about canadians" : a qualitative study of how caregivers and patients influence regulation of medical assistance in dying in Canada

Article indépendant

JEANNERET, Ruthie | CLOSE, Eliana | DOWNIE, Jocelyn | WILLMOTT, Lindy | WHITE, Ben P.

Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalised federally in Canada after the Supreme Court decision in Carter v Canada (Attorney General) [2015] 1 SCR 331. The federal legislative framework for MAiD was established via Bill C-14 in 2016. Caregivers and patients were central to Carter and subsequent litigation and advocacy, which resulted in amendments to the law via Bill C-7 in 2021. Research has primarily focused on the impacts of regulation on caregivers and patients. This qualitative study investigates how caregivers and patients influence law reform and the operation of MAiD practice in Canada (ie, behave as 'regulatory actors'), using Black's definition of regulation. We found that caregivers and patients performed sustained, focused, and intentional actions that influenced law reform and the operation of MAiD in practice. Caregivers and patients are not passive objects of Canadian MAiD regulation, and their role in influencing regulation (eg, law reform and MAiD practice) should be supported where this is desired by the person. However, recognising the burdens of engaging in regulatory action to address barriers to accessing MAiD or to quality care, and MAiD system gaps, other regulatory actors (eg, governments) should minimise this burden, particularly where a person engages in regulatory action reluctantly.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae012

Voir la revue «Medical law review»

Autres numéros de la revue «Medical law review»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

A qualitative study of experiences of institu...

Article indépendant | CLOSE, Eliana | BMC medical ethics | n°1 | vol.24

BACKGROUND: In June 2016, Canada legalized medical assistance in dying (MAiD). From the outset, some healthcare institutions (including faith-based and non-faith-based hospitals, hospices, and residential aged care facilities) hav...

A qualitative study of experiences of institu...

Article indépendant | CLOSE, Eliana | BMC medical ethics | n°1 | vol.24

BACKGROUND: In June 2016, Canada legalized medical assistance in dying (MAiD). From the outset, some healthcare institutions (including faith-based and non-faith-based hospitals, hospices, and residential aged care facilities) hav...

"My advocacy is not about me, my advocacy is ...

Article indépendant | JEANNERET, Ruthie | Medical law review

Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalised federally in Canada after the Supreme Court decision in Carter v Canada (Attorney General) [2015] 1 SCR 331. The federal legislative framework for MAiD was established via Bill C-14...

De la même série

How does regulation influence euthanasia prac...

Article indépendant | ARCHER, Madeleine | Medical law review | n°1 | vol.33

Euthanasia has been legal in Belgium since 2002. Despite extensive research exploring Belgian euthanasia practice, investigations into its governing regulatory framework are limited. Existing studies that consider regulation take ...

How best to regulate voluntary assisted dying...

Article indépendant | WHITE, Ben P. | Medical law review | n°1 | vol.33

It is widely accepted that voluntary assisted dying (VAD) should be regulated but little is known about the most effective way to regulate doctors in this setting. This article reports on empirical research conducted in two Austra...

Assisted dying, vulnerability, and the potent...

Article indépendant | MULLOCK, Alexandra | Medical law review | n°2 | vol.33

Concern for vulnerable people is a crucial issue when considering the legalization of assisted dying (AD), but the meaning and normative significance of vulnerability in this context is under-explored. We examine vulnerability and...

Mortier v belgium [2022] echr 764 : warning s...

Article indépendant | BURT, Chay M. | Medical law review | n°4 | vol.31

The case of Mortier v Belgium,1 heard in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), considered the compatibility of a permissive framework for assisted dying against rights enshrined within the European Convention on Human Rights...

A human rights perspective of assisted suicid...

Article indépendant | MARTIN, Stevie S. | Medical law review | n°1 | vol.26

This article critically examines the decision of the New Zealand High Court in Seales v Attorney-General [2015] NZHC 1239, which rejected the claim that that country's blanket ban on assisted suicide violated various rights enshri...

Chargement des enrichissements...