Do socioeconomic factors influence knowledge, attitudes, and representations of end-of-life practices? : a cross-sectional study

Article indépendant

BERUBE, A. | TAPP, D. | DUPERE, S. | PLAISANCE, A. | BRAVO, G. | DOWNAR, J. | COUTURE, V.

Objective: Access to palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care might be influenced by knowledge, attitudes, and representations of these practices. Socioeconomic factors might then affect what people know about EOL care practices, and how they perceive them. This study aims to compare knowledge, attitudes, and representations regarding EOL practices including assisted suicide, medical assistance in dying, and continuous palliative sedation of adults, according to socioeconomic variables. Methods: A cross-sectional community-based questionnaire study featuring two evolving vignettes and five end-of-life practices was conducted in Quebec, Canada. Three sample subgroups were created according to the participants' perceived financial situation and three according to educational attainment. Descriptive analysis was used to compare levels of knowledge, attitudes, and representations between the subgroups. Results: Nine hundred sixty-six (966) people completed the questionnaire. Two hundred and seventy participants (28.7%) had a high school diploma or less, and 42 participants (4.4%) were facing financial hardship. The majority of respondents supported all end-of-life options and the loosening of eligibility requirements for medical assistance in dying. Differences between subgroups were minor. While respondents in socioeconomically disadvantaged subgroups had less knowledge about EOL practices, those with lower educational attainment were more likely to be in favor of medical assistance in dying, and less likely to favor continuous palliative sedation. Conclusions: People living with situational social and economic vulnerabilities face multiple barriers in accessing health care. While they may have poorer knowledge about EOL practices, they have a positive attitude towards medical assistance in dying and assisted suicide, and a negative attitude towards continuous palliative sedation. This highlights the need for future research and interventions aimed at empowering this population and enhancing their access to EOL care.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08258597221131658

Voir la revue «JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE»

Autres numéros de la revue «JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion