Should providers ask family members what they want when establishing surrogate decision-making?

Article indépendant

HOWE, Edmund G.

In this piece I discuss optimal approaches that providers may take when pursuing surrogate decision-making. A potential critical problem here is some providers' approach differing from that of others. To the extent that this occurs, the results may be arbitrary, and the harm from this may be profound since this may affect, of course, even whether some of these patients will live or die. One factor possibly resulting in these differences is the moral weight providers place on what family members want when these outcomes differ from what they think patients would want. Providers now most commonly place greatest moral weight on following what patients would want to maximally respect their autonomy, but this view may clash with the view of others who see autonomy as more relational and thus based on prior and present social relations with others. Giving family members' wants more moral weight is a radical departure from what providers do now and may increase these differences. I discuss here the rationales for and against these competing choices.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/730874

Voir la revue «The journal of clinical ethics, 35»

Autres numéros de la revue «The journal of clinical ethics»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion