Co-design use in palliative care intervention development : a systematic review

Article indépendant

GIANNITRAPANI, Karleen F. | LIN, Kendall | MAHETA, Bhagvat | ISENBERG, Sarina R.

CONTEXT: Co-design is a methodology that includes active collaboration between stakeholders in designing solutions and has been used in the development and implementation of palliative care (PC) interventions. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize the state of evidence for co-design in the development of PC interventions. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed studies published after 1995 that reported evidence of co-designed interventions and outcomes in patients receiving palliative, hospice, or end-of-life care. We screened studies through independent and blinded dual review within Covidence and assessed study quality with the 2018 Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We narratively synthesized co-design duration, engagement approach, stakeholders involved, intervention designs, follow-ups, and outcomes, comparing among co-designs reporting meaningful improvement in outcomes. We created a best practice checklist which we used to evaluate co-design use in each study. RESULTS: 1,036 abstracts and 54 full text articles were screened. 28 studies met inclusion criteria and were abstracted. Feedback collection modalities ranged from iterative drafting, pilot testing, advisory panels, workshops, focus groups, and interviews. 13 studies applied pretesting/prototyping through pre-test post-test, focus groups, prototypes, alpha and beta testing, and mock-ups. 11 studies reported improved outcomes, 8 of which utilized iterative co-design. All the studies reporting improved outcomes mentioned meeting with stakeholders at least twice. 2 studies met all criteria in our co-design best practice checklist. CONCLUSION: Co-designed PC interventions demonstrate high variance in the modality of acquiring feedback and application of co-design. Successful co-design leading to improvement in outcomes is achieved by involving patients, caregivers, and providers in iterating intervention design.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.06.007

Voir la revue «JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT»

Autres numéros de la revue «JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Mapping interdisciplinary role ownership over...

Article | CHOW, Janice Kishi | The American journal of hospice and palliative care

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of mapping interdisciplinary role ownership over actionable practices identified from qualitative comments in the Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey (BFS). METHODS: We polled two provider...

Mapping interdisciplinary role ownership over...

Article indépendant | CHOW, Janice Kishi | The American journal of hospice and palliative care

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of mapping interdisciplinary role ownership over actionable practices identified from qualitative comments in the Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey (BFS). METHODS: We polled two provider...

Serious illness care quality during covid-19 ...

Article indépendant | GIANNITRAPANI, Karleen F. | PALLIATIVE MEDICINE | n°7 | vol.37

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 significantly impacted care delivery to seriously ill patients, especially around including family and caregivers in patient care. AIM: Based on routinely collected bereaved family reports, actionable practice...

De la même série

Intention-to-treat analyses for randomised co...

Article indépendant | KOCHOVSKA, Slavica | JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT | n°3 | vol.599

INTRODUCTION: Minimising bias in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) includes intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. Hospice/palliative care RCTs are constrained by high attrition unpredictable when consenting, including withdrawals b...

Cancer pain management in patients receiving ...

Article indépendant | TAGAMI, Keita | JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT | n°1 | vol.67

CONTEXT: Cancer pain is a common complication that is frequently undertreated in patients with cancer. OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed at assessing the time needed to achieve cancer pain management goals through specialized pallia...

Multilevel determinants of palliative care re...

Article indépendant | CHO, Susie | JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT | n°1 | vol.67

CONTEXT: Receipt of palliative care (PC) has long been suggested in practice for patients with advanced cancer for improved quality of life, mood, and prolonged survival. However, PC referrals in women with ovarian cancer remain s...

Barriers for adult patients to access palliat...

Article indépendant | PITZER, Stefan | JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT | n°1 | vol.67

BACKGROUND: Access to palliative care services is variable, and many inpatients do not receive palliative care. An overview of potential barriers could facilitate the development of strategies to overcome factors that impede acces...

Religious, cultural and sex influences on adv...

Article indépendant | OSHOW, Fariah | JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT | n°1 | vol.67

INTRODUCTION: Advance care directives (AD) are instructions from patients regarding the care they would prefer if they could not make medical decisions in the future. It is widely recognized that racial and ethnic as well as sex d...

Chargement des enrichissements...