Lomustine and Bevacizumab in Progressive Glioblastoma

Archive ouverte

Wick, Wolfgang | Gorlia, Thierry | Bendszus, Martin | Taphoorn, Martin | Sahm, Felix | Harting, Inga | Brandes, Alba | Taal, Walter | Domont, Julien | Idbaih, Ahmed | Campone, Mario | Clement, Paul | Stupp, Roger | Fabbro, Michel | Le Rhun, Emilie | Dubois, Francois | Weller, Michael | von Deimling, Andreas | Golfinopoulos, Vassilis | Bromberg, Jacoline | Platten, Michael | Klein, Martin | van den Bent, Martin

Edité par CCSD ; Massachusetts Medical Society -

International audience. Background: Bevacizumab is approved for the treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma on the basis of uncontrolled data. Data from a phase 2 trial suggested that the addition of bevacizumab to lomustine might improve overall survival as compared with monotherapies. We sought to determine whether the combination would result in longer overall survival than lomustine alone among patients at first progression of glioblastoma.Methods: We randomly assigned patients with progression after chemoradiation in a 2:1 ratio to receive lomustine plus bevacizumab (combination group, 288 patients) or lomustine alone (monotherapy group, 149 patients). The methylation status of the promoter of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) was assessed. Health-related quality of life and neurocognitive function were evaluated at baseline and every 12 weeks. The primary end point of the trial was overall survival.Results: A total of 437 patients underwent randomization. The median number of 6-week treatment cycles was three in the combination group and one in the monotherapy group. With 329 overall survival events (75.3%), the combination therapy did not provide a survival advantage; the median overall survival was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 10.1) in the combination group and 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 10.4) in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.21; P=0.65). Locally assessed progression-free survival was 2.7 months longer in the combination group than in the monotherapy group: 4.2 months versus 1.5 months (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.61; P<0.001). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 63.6% of the patients in the combination group and 38.1% of the patients in the monotherapy group. The addition of bevacizumab to lomustine affected neither health-related quality of life nor neurocognitive function. The MGMT status was prognostic.Conclusions: Despite somewhat prolonged progression-free survival, treatment with lomustine plus bevacizumab did not confer a survival advantage over treatment with lomustine alone in patients with progressive glioblastoma. (Funded by an unrestricted educational grant from F. Hoffmann-La Roche and by the EORTC Cancer Research Fund; EORTC 26101 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01290939 ; Eudra-CT number, 2010-023218-30 .).

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Imaging necrosis during treatment is associated with worse survival in EORTC 26101 study

Archive ouverte | Nowosielski, Martha | CCSD

International audience

Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma

Archive ouverte | Tesileanu, C Mircea S | CCSD

International audience. Abstract Background Survival in patients with IDH1/2-mutant (mt) anaplastic astrocytomas is highly variable. We have used the prospective phase 3 CATNON trial to identify molecular factors re...

Temozolomide and Radiotherapy versus Radiotherapy Alone in Patients with Glioblastoma, IDH -wildtype: Post Hoc Analysis of the EORTC Randomized Phase III CATNON Trial

Archive ouverte | Tesileanu, C. Mircea S. | CCSD

International audience. Abstract Purpose: In a post hoc analysis of the CATNON trial (NCT00626990), we explored whether adding temozolomide to radiotherapy improves outcome in patients with IDH1/2 wildtype (wt) anap...

Chargement des enrichissements...