Estimation of subject coregistration errors during multimodal preclinical imaging using separate instruments: origins and avoidance of artifacts.

Archive ouverte

Dillenseger, Jean-Philippe | Goetz, Christian | Sayeh, Amira | Healy, C | Duluc, Isabelle | Freund, Jean-Noël | Constantinesco, André | Aubertin-Kirch, Gaëlle | Choquet, Philippe

Edité par CCSD ; SPIE Digital Library -

International audience. We use high-resolution [Formula: see text] data in multiple experiments to estimate the sources of error during coregistration of images acquired on separate preclinical instruments. In combination with experiments with phantoms, we completed in vivo imaging on mice, aimed at identifying the possible sources of registration errors, caused either by transport of the animal, movement of the animal itself, or methods of coregistration. The same imaging cell was used as a holder for phantoms and animals. For all procedures, rigid coregistration was carried out using a common landmark coregistration system, placed inside the imaging cell. We used the fiducial registration error and the target registration error to analyze the coregistration accuracy. We found that moving an imaging cell between two preclinical devices during a multimodal procedure gives an error of about [Formula: see text] at most. Therefore, it could not be considered a source of coregistration errors. Errors linked to spontaneous movements of the animal increased with time, to nearly 1 mm at most, excepted for body parts that were properly restrained. This work highlights the importance of animal intrinsic movements during a multiacquisition procedure and demonstrates a simple method to identify and quantify the sources of error during coregistration.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Comparison of bioimpedance spectroscopy and X-Ray microcomputed tomography for total fat volume measurement in mice

Archive ouverte | Aubertin-Kirch, Gaëlle | CCSD

Obesity and the metabolic syndrome are two pathologies whose prevalence are in a constant increase. Evaluation of the total fat mass but also of the distribution between visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue are important facto...

Preclinical multimodal small animal imaging : qualification of instruments and methods (MRI, µCT and µSPECT). Imagerie préclinique multimodale chez le petit animal : qualification des instruments et des méthodes (IRM, µTDM et µTEMP)

Archive ouverte | Dillenseger, Jean-Philippe | CCSD

Preclinical imaging is mostly performed on mouse animal models (61%). It is a necessary step in preclinical research, in compliance the first two recommendations of the 3Rs rules (reduction, refinement and replacement). In order t...

Echographie

Archive ouverte | Dillenseger, Jean-Philippe | CCSD

National audience. L'ouvrage de référence pour les utilisateurs d'imageurs médicauxLa complexité technique la spécialisation et l'émergence de nouveaux champs de compétences créent un important besoin d'apprentissag...

Chargement des enrichissements...