Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach.

Archive ouverte

Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste | Pagniez, Dominique | Boulanger, Eric | Lessore de Sainte Foy, Celia | Salleron, Julia | Frimat, Luc | Duhamel, Alain

Edité par CCSD ; BioMed Central -

International audience. ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In survival analysis, patients on peritoneal dialysis are confronted with three different outcomes: transfer to hemodialysis, renal transplantation, or death. The Kaplan-Meier method takes into account one event only, so whether it adequately considers these different risks is questionable. The more recent competing risks method has been shown to be more appropriate in analyzing such situations METHODS: We compared the estimations obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and the competing risks method (namely the Kalbfleisch and Prentice approach), in 383 consecutive incident peritoneal dialysis patients. By means of simulations, we then compared the Kaplan-Meier estimations obtained in two virtual centers where patients had exactly the same probability of death. The only difference between these two virtual centers was whether renal transplantation was available or not. RESULTS: At five years, 107 (27.9%) patients had died, 109 (28.4%) had been transferred to hemodialysis, 91 (23.8%) had been transplanted, and 37 (9.7%) were still alive on peritoneal dialysis; before five years, 39 (10.2%) patients were censored alive on peritoneal dialysis. The five-year probabilities estimated by the Kaplan-Meier and the competing risks methods were respectively: death: 50% versus 30%; transfer to hemodialysis: 59% versus 32%; renal transplantation: 39% versus 26%; event-free survival: 12% versus 12%. The sum of the Kaplan-Meier estimations exceeded 100%, implying that patients could experience more than one event, death and transplantation for example, which is impossible. In the simulations, the probability of death estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method increased as the probability of renal transplantation increased, although the probability of death actually remained constant. CONCLUSION: The competing risks method appears more appropriate than the Kaplan-Meier method for estimating the probability of events in peritoneal dialysis in the context of univariable survival analysis.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Registration on the Renal Transplantation Waiting List and Mortality on Dialysis: an Analysis of the French REIN Registry Using a Multi-state Model

Archive ouverte | Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste | CCSD

International audience. AbstractBackground: Access to the renal transplantation (RT) waiting list depends on factors related to lower mortality rates and often occurs after dialysis initiation. The aim of the study ...

No increase in small-solute transport in peritoneal dialysis patients treated without hypertonic glucose for fifty-four months

Archive ouverte | Pagniez, Dominique | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND:Glucose is widely used as an osmotic agent in peritoneal dialysis (PD), but exerts untoward effects on the peritoneum. The potential protective effect of a reduced exposure to hype...

Competing risks ans multi-state models in the survival analysis patients. Risques concurrents et modèles multi-états dans les analyses de survie en dialyse

Archive ouverte | Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste | CCSD

In survival analysis, a competing risk is an event that hinders the observation of the event of interest (usually death). If the probability of a competing risk depends on the probability of the event of interest, then it can not ...

Chargement des enrichissements...