How to translate therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines into rules for critiquing physician prescriptions? Methods and application to five guidelines.

Archive ouverte

Lamy, Jean-Baptiste | Ebrahiminia, Vahid | Riou, Christine | Seroussi, Brigitte | Bouaud, Jacques | Simon, Christian | Dubois, Stéphane | Butti, Antoine | Simon, Gérard | Favre, Madeleine | Falcoff, Hector | Venot, Alain

Edité par CCSD ; BioMed Central -

International audience. BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines give recommendations about what to do in various medical situations, including therapeutical recommendations for drug prescription. An effective way to computerize these recommendations is to design critiquing decision support systems, i.e. systems that criticize the physician's prescription when it does not conform to the guidelines. These systems are commonly based on a list of "if conditions then criticism" rules. However, writing these rules from the guidelines is not a trivial task. The objective of this article is to propose methods that (1) simplify the implementation of guidelines' therapeutical recommendations in critiquing systems by automatically translating structured therapeutical recommendations into a list of "if conditions then criticize" rules, and (2) can generate an appropriate textual label to explain to the physician why his/her prescription is not recommended. METHODS: We worked on the therapeutic recommendations in five clinical practice guidelines concerning chronic diseases related to the management of cardiovascular risk. We evaluated the system using a test base of more than 2000 cases. RESULTS: Algorithms for automatically translating therapeutical recommendations into "if conditions then criticize" rules are presented. Eight generic recommendations are also proposed; they are guideline-independent, and can be used as default behaviour for handling various situations that are usually implicit in the guidelines, such as decreasing the dose of a poorly tolerated drug. Finally, we provide models and methods for generating a human-readable textual critique. The system was successfully evaluated on the test base. CONCLUSION: We show that it is possible to criticize physicians' prescriptions starting from a structured clinical guideline, and to provide clear explanations. We are now planning a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of the system on practices.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

A generic system for critiquing physicians' prescriptions: usability, satisfaction and lessons learnt.

Archive ouverte | Lamy, Jean-Baptiste | CCSD

International audience. Clinical decision support systems have been developed to help physicians to take clinical guidelines into account during consultations. The ASTI critiquing module is one such systems; it prov...

A medical informatics perspective on clinical decision support systems. Findings from the yearbook 2013 section on decision support.

Archive ouverte | Bouaud, Jacques | CCSD

International audience. OBJECTIVE: To summarize excellent research and to select best papers published in 2012 in the field of computer-based decision support in healthcare. METHODS: A bibliographic search focused o...

Comparison of four visual analytics techniques for the visualization of adverse drug event rates in clinical trials

Archive ouverte | Lamy, Jean-Baptiste | CCSD

International audience. Drugs are evaluated and compared during clinical trials, and the observed adverse drug events are recorded. Many trial results are available online in trial registries, such as ClinicalTrials...

Chargement des enrichissements...