Three-Year Outcomes With Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided or Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction

Archive ouverte

Puymirat, Etienne | Cayla, Guillaume | Simon, Tabassome | Steg, Philippe Gabriel | Montalescot, Gilles | Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle | Ngaleu Siaha, Fabiola | Gallet, Romain | Khalife, Khalife | Morelle, Jean-François | Motreff, Pascal | Lemesle, Gilles | Dillinger, Jean-Guillaume | Lhermusier, Thibault | Silvain, Johanne | Roule, Vincent | Labèque, Jean-Noel | Rangé, Grégoire | Ducrocq, Grégory | Cottin, Yves | Blanchard, Didier | Charles-Nelson, Anais | Djadi-Prat, Juliette | Chatellier, Gilles | Danchin, Nicolas

Edité par CCSD ; American Heart Association -

International audience. BACKGROUND: In patients with multivessel disease with successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, the FLOWER-MI trial (Flow Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multivessel ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) showed that a fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided strategy was not superior to an angiography-guided strategy for treatment of noninfarct-related artery lesions regarding the 1-year risk of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization. The extension phase of the trial was planned using the same primary outcome to determine whether a difference in outcomes would be observed with a longer follow-up. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease with successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the infarct-related artery to receive complete revascularization guided by either FFR (n=586) or angiography (n=577). RESULTS: After 3 years, a primary outcome event occurred in 52 of 498 patients (9.40%) in the FFR-guided group and in 44 of 502 patients (8.17%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.79–1.77]; P =0.4). Death occurred in 22 patients (4.00%) in the FFR-guided group and in 23 (4.32%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.53–1.71]); nonfatal myocardial infarction in 23 (4.13%) and 14 (2.56%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 0.84–3.16]); and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization in 21 (3.83%) and 18 (3.36%; hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.61–2.16]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although event rates in the trial were lower than expected, in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing complete revascularization, an FFR-guided strategy did not have a significant benefit over an angiography-guided strategy with respect to the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization up to 3 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02943954.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction

Archive ouverte | Puymirat, Etienne | CCSD

International audience. In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have multivessel disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for nonculprit lesions (complete revascularization) is super...

Immediate versus staged complete myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: A post hoc analysis of the randomized FLOWER-MI trial

Archive ouverte | Tea, Victoria | CCSD

International audience

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial

Archive ouverte | Guedeney, Paul | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...