Difficulties in Manipulating the Female Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pump: Prevalence and Management

Archive ouverte

Dubois, Alexandre | Lethuillier, Valentine | Richard, Claire | Haudebert, Camille | Penafiel, Juan | Voiry, Caroline | Jezequel, Magali | Emmanuel, Emmanuelle | Berthelot, Ouis-Paul | Freton, Lucas | Hascoet, Juliette | Manunta, Andréa | Peyronnet, Benoît

Edité par CCSD ; Korean Continence Society -

International audience. PURPOSE: While pump manipulation is rarely problematic in male patients with artificial urinary sphincters (AUSs), the situation may differ in female patients due to anatomical or cultural factors. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of difficulties in pump manipulation among female AUS patients, identify associated risk factors, and explore management strategies for this challenging issue. METHODS: Data were collected from all female patients who underwent a robotic AUS implantation at a single academic center between 2014 and 2022. The primary endpoint was temporary difficulties, defined by at least one other short hospitalization to learn pump manipulation. RESULTS: Out of the 88 female AUS patients included in the study, 20 experienced initial difficulties manipulating the pump, accounting for 22.7% of the group. Temporary difficulties were reported by 16 patients (18.2%), while 4 patients (4.5%) had their devices permanently deactivated. Surgical reoperations to reposition the pump were necessary for 5 patients, representing 5.6% of the sample. The only variables significantly associated with temporary difficulties were longer operative time (183.4 minutes vs. 159.1 minutes, P=0.04) and the overall experience of the center (32 vs. 50, P=0.04). The sole variable significantly linked to serious difficulties was the overall experience of the center (11 vs. 47, P=0.004). Although the median age and body mass index were higher in the group with temporary difficulties, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Difficulties in manipulating the pump are relatively common among female AUS patients. Most of these difficulties can be resolved through repeated patient education and careful follow-up. However, some may lead to serious complications. Raising awareness of this issue, along with ongoing patient education and meticulous follow-up, may help to minimize these consequences.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Impact of Robotic Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Female Patients on Quality of Life and Patient-reported Outcomes

Archive ouverte | Dubois, Alexandre | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is commonly used in France in female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). ...

Robotic female artificial urinary sphincter implantation vs. male artificial urinary sphincter implantation for non-neurogenic stress urinary incontinence

Archive ouverte | Dubois, Alexandre | CCSD

International audience. PURPOSE: Previous studies suggested better functional outcomes and longer device survival for female artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation compared to male AUS implantation. We hypo...

Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder: Comparison of the open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches

Archive ouverte | Haudebert, Camille | CCSD

International audience. Aim The objective of the present study was to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUT...

Chargement des enrichissements...