A comprehensive framework to assess multi‐species landscape connectivity

Archive ouverte

Prima, Marie‐caroline | Renaud, Julien | Witté, Isabelle | Suarez, Léa | Rouveyrol, Paul | Fernando, Martina | Sacchi, Andrea | Cosentino, Francesca | Santini, Luca | Maiorano, Luigi | Moreira, Francisco | Dertien, Jeremy | Fernández, Néstor | Thuiller, Wilfried

Edité par CCSD ; Wiley -

International audience. Due to the central role of landscape connectivity in many ecological processes, evaluating and accounting for it has gained attention in both theoretical and applied ecological sciences. To address this challenge, researchers often use generic species to simplify multi-species connectivity assessments. Yet, this approach tends to oversimplify movement behaviour, likely reducing realism and precision of connectivity model outputs. Also, the most widely used methods and theories for assessing landscape connectivity, namely circuit and network theories, have strong limitations. Finally, uncertainty or robustness estimates are rarely integrated in connectivity assessments. Here, we propose a versatile framework, which, instead of using arbitrary defined generic species, first identifies species groups based on species' environmental niches and morphological, biological, and ecological traits. Second, it combines circuit and network theories to take the best of the two methods to assess landscape connectivity for those groups, while integrating uncertainties in modelling choices. Specifically, ecological continuities (i.e. landscape elements contributing to connectivity) are calculated for these groups and used together with group dispersal capacities to derive network-based connectivity metrics for conservation areas. We detailed our framework through a case study where we assess the connectivity of 1619 protected areas in metropolitan France for 193 vertebrate species. Our study revealed that both the protection of ecological continuities and the connectivity of protected areas for 11 mammal and 19 bird groups, respectively, were quite low, with variations among groups. Different protection types (i.e. national parks, reserves or prefectural orders) contributed unequally to the overall connectivity of group-specific suitable habitats. Considering uncertainty propagation was crucial, as many connectivity metrics varied among repetitions.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Effectiveness assessment of pond creation and maintenance measures in Natura 2000 sites. Évaluation de l'efficacité de mesures de création et d'entretien de mares en sites Natura 2000

Archive ouverte | Bernard, Camille | CCSD

L’OFB, appuyé par le Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, publie chaque année depuis 2019 un Appel à Manifestations d’Intérêts visant à financer des suivis d’après un cadre méthodologique commun défini par PatriNat en parallèle d...

Global drivers of population density in terrestrial vertebrates

Archive ouverte | Santini, Luca | CCSD

International audience. Aim: Although the effects of life history traits on population density have been investigated widely, how spatial environmental variation influences population density for a large range of or...

Spatial mismatch of phylogenetic diversity across three vertebrate groups and protected areas in Europe

Archive ouverte | Zupan, Laure | CCSD

International audience. AimWe investigate patterns of phylogenetic diversity in relation to species diversity for European birds, mammals and amphibians to evaluate their congruence and highlight areas of particular...

Chargement des enrichissements...