Is " Kidney Stone Calculator " efficient in predicting ureteroscopic lithotripsy duration ? A holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers comparative analysis

Archive ouverte

Chicaud, Marie | Kutchukian, Stessy | Doizi, Steeve | Candela, Luigi | Solano, Catalina | Corrales, Mariela | Traxer, Olivier | Panthier, Fréderic | Berthe, Laurent | Descazeaud, Aurélien | Audenet, François | Timsit, Marc Olivier | Mejean, Arnaud | Yonneau, Laurent | Lebret, Thierry | Duquesne, Igor

Edité par CCSD ; Springer Verlag -

International audience. Purpose : This study aimed to evaluate the ability of Kidney Stone Calculator (KSC), a flexible ureteroscopy surgical planning software, to predict the lithotripsy duration with both holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL). Methods : A multicenter prospective study was conducted from January 2020 to April 2023. Patients with kidney or ureteral stones confirmed at non-contrast computed tomography and treated by flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy were enrolled. " Kidney Stone Calculator " provided stone volume and subsequent lithotripsy duration estimation using three-dimensional segmentation of the stone on computed tomography and the graphical user interface for laser settings. The primary endpoint was the quantitative and qualitative comparison between estimated and effective lithotripsy durations. Secondary endpoints included subgroup analysis (Ho:YAGu2013TFL) of differences between estimated and effective lithotripsy durations and intraoperative outcomes. Multivariate analysis assessed the association between pre- and intraoperative variables and these differences according to laser source. Results : 89 patients were included in this study, 43 and 46 in Ho:YAG and TFL groups, respectively. No significant difference was found between estimated and effective lithotripsy durations (27.37 vs 28.36 min, p = 0.43) with a significant correlation (r = + 0.89, p < 0.001). Among groups, this difference did not differ (p = 0.68 and 0.07, respectively), with a higher correlation between estimated and effective lithotripsy durations for TFL compared to Ho:YAG (r = + 0.95, p < 0.001 vs r = + 0.81, p < 0.001, respectively). At multivariate analysis, the difference was correlated with preoperative (volume > 2000 mm3 (Ho:YAG), 500u2013750 mm3 SV and calyceal diverticulum (TFL)), operative (fragmentation setting (p > 0.001), and basket utilization (p = 0.05) (Ho:YAG)) variables. Conclusion : KSC is a reliable tool for predicting the lithotripsy duration estimation during flexible ureteroscopy for both Ho:YAG and TFL. However, some variables not including laser source may lead to underestimating this estimation.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Initial clinical experience with the pulsed solid-state thulium YAG laser from Dornier during RIRS: first 25 cases

Archive ouverte | Panthier, Frédéric | CCSD

International audience. Introduction: Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber (TFL) lasers are currently the two laser sources recommended for endocorporeal laser lithotripsy (ELL). Recently, the...

Evaluation of a free 3D software for kidney stones’ surgical planning: “kidney stone calculator” a pilot study

Archive ouverte | Panthier, Frédéric | CCSD

International audience. Introduction: Kidney Stone Calculator (KSC) is a free, three-dimensional (3D) planning software for flexible ureteroscopy(fURS) with Holmium:YAG(Ho:YAG) endocorporeal lithotripsy (EL). KSC pr...

Clinical Reproducibility of the Stone Volume Measurement: A “Kidney Stone Calculator” Study

Archive ouverte | Peyrottes, Arthur | CCSD

International audience. Background: An accurate estimation of the stone burden is the key factor for predicting retrograde intra-renal surgical outcomes. Volumetric calculations better stratify stone burden than lin...

Chargement des enrichissements...