Quantification of zoonotic pathogenic bacteria in manures and raw digestates of three biogas plants

Archive ouverte

Ziebal, Christine | Denis, Martine | Druilhe, Céline | Le Maréchal, Caroline | Derongs, Lorine | Répérant, Elisabeth | Rouxel, Sandra | Heurtevent, Lorette | Poezevara, Typhaine | Nagard, Bérengère | Martin, Laure | Houdayer, Catherine | Barbut, Frederic | Pourcher, Anne-Marie

Edité par CCSD -

International audience. IntroductionOn-farm anaerobic digestion (AD) which has expanded in Europe, produced biogas and a by-product(digestate) used as fertilizer. However, very few studies have been devoted to the effect of AD onthe level of pathogenic bacteria. The study aims to evaluate the impact of mesophilic AD on theconcentrations of zoonotic pathogenic bacteria (Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp,thermotolerant campylobacters) and on indicator bacteria (E. coli and enterococci) in manures and inraw digestates sampled in three biogas plants (BGP).Materials and MethodsSamples were collected in storage tank (manures) and at the outlet valve of the digester (rawdigestates) from three BGP during a one-year period (8 sampling dates per BGP, 3 replicates persampling date). Two digesters were fed with pig manure. The third digester was essentially fed withcattle manure. Indicator bacteria were enumerated on specific agar media. Pathogenic bacteria werequantified after an enrichment step by MPN. A total of 144 samples (72 inputs, 72 digestates) wereanalyzed.ResultsThe pathogens have been detected in manure at a frequency ranged between 92 and 96%. Theywere also present in raw digestate at a frequency of 38% (thermotolerant campylobacters), 83% (L.monocytogenes) and 88 % (Salmonella spp.). The concentrations were lower in raw digestates thanin manures. The average concentrations of thermotolerant campylobacters, L. monocytogenes andSalmonella spp. in raw digestates were 2, 23 and 5 MPN/g, respectively. The average levels of E.coliand enterococci (104-105 cfu/g in manure) decreased by 1 to 2 Log10 during AD.ConclusionAlthough mesophilic AD did not eliminate the pathogenic bacteria, it reduced their concentration.Raw digestates are not directly spread on agricultural land. It is thus likely that their post-treatment(eg. storage or post-digestion) also contribute to limit the spread of pathogens together with thedigestate onto agricultural land.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Quantification of indicator and pathogenic bacteria in manures and digestates from three agricultural biogas plants over a one-year period

Archive ouverte | Pourcher, Anne-Marie | CCSD

International audience. Interest in the conversion of manure in biogas via anaerobic digestion (AD) is growing, but questions remain about the biosafety of digestates. For a period of one year, we monitored the impa...

Devenir des Clostridium et de bactéries pathogènes non sporulantes au cours de la digestion anaérobie mésophile des effluents d'élevage

Archive ouverte | Anne-Marie, Pourcher | CCSD

Alors que la méthanisation mésophile est en plein essor, des questions demeurent sur l’impact de ce procédé sur la qualité sanitaire des digestats. Dans ce contexte, les objectifs du projet CloDia sont (i) d’évaluer sur 3 sites ag...

PathoGaz - Impact sanitaire de la méthanisation agricole mésophile. PathoGaz - Impact sanitaire de la méthanisation agricole mésophile: Etude de la persistance des bactéries pathogènes et/ou résistantes aux antibiotiques le long de la filière

Archive ouverte | Pourcher, Anne-Marie | CCSD

Le projet PathoGaz se situe dans la continuité du projet CloDia. Alors que ce dernier se limitait à l’impact de la digestion anaérobie mésophile sur les bactéries indicatrices d’efficacité de traitement (BIET) et sur des bactéries...

Chargement des enrichissements...