Machine learning-based scoring system to predict in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

Archive ouverte

Weizman, Orianne | Duceau, Baptiste | Trimaille, Antonin | Pommier, Thibaut | Cellier, Joffrey | Geneste, Laura | Panagides, Vassili | Marsou, Wassima | Deney, Antoine | Attou, Sabir | Delmotte, Thomas | Ribeyrolles, Sophie | Chemaly, Pascale | Karsenty, Clément | Giordano, Gauthier | Gautier, Alexandre | Chaumont, Corentin | Guilleminot, Pierre | Sagnard, Audrey | Pastier, Julie | Ezzouhairi, Nacim | Perin, Benjamin | Zakine, Cyril | Levasseur, Thomas | Ma, Iris | Chavignier, Diane | Noirclerc, Nathalie | Darmon, Arthur | Mevelec, Marine | Sutter, Willy | Mika, Delphine | Fauvel, Charles | Pezel, Théo | Waldmann, Victor | Cohen, Ariel | Bonnet, Guillaume

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier ; Société française de cardiologie [2008-....] -

International audience. Background: The evolution of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still hard to predict, even after several months of dealing with the pandemic.Aims: To develop and validate a score to predict outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.Methods: All consecutive adults hospitalized for COVID-19 from February to April 2020 were included in a nationwide observational study. Primary composite outcome was transfer to an intensive care unit from an emergency department or conventional ward, or in-hospital death. A score that estimates the risk of experiencing the primary outcome was constructed from a derivation cohort using stacked LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), and was tested in a validation cohort.Results: Among 2873 patients analysed (57.9% men; 66.6±17.0 years), the primary outcome occurred in 838 (29.2%) patients: 551 (19.2%) were transferred to an intensive care unit; and 287 (10.0%) died in-hospital without transfer to an intensive care unit. Using stacked LASSO, we identified 11 variables independently associated with the primary outcome in multivariable analysis in the derivation cohort (n=2313), including demographics (sex), triage vitals (body temperature, dyspnoea, respiratory rate, fraction of inspired oxygen, blood oxygen saturation) and biological variables (pH, platelets, C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase, estimated glomerular filtration rate). The Critical COVID-19 France (CCF) risk score was then developed, and displayed accurate calibration and discrimination in the derivation cohort, with C-statistics of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.80). The CCF risk score performed significantly better (i.e. higher C-statistics) than the usual critical care risk scores.Conclusions: The CCF risk score was built using data collected routinely at hospital admission to predict outcomes in patients with COVID-19. This score holds promise to improve early triage of patients and allocation of healthcare resources.

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Mémoire et thèse
• Gestion