International Multicenter Validation Study of the SAGIT® Instrument in Acromegaly

Archive ouverte

Giustina, Andrea | Bronstein, Marcello | Chanson, Philippe | Petersenn, Stephan | Casanueva, Felipe | Sert, Caroline | Houchard, Aude | Melmed, Shlomo

Edité par CCSD ; Endocrine Society -

International audience. Abstract Context The SAGIT® instrument (SAGIT) has been developed to enable accurate characterization of acromegaly disease activity. Objective We evaluated the ability of SAGIT to discriminate acromegaly disease control status. Methods This multicenter, noninterventional, prospective and retrospective, longitudinal study, conducted at academic and private clinical practice sites, included patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of controlled (n = 109) or non-controlled (n = 105) acromegaly, assessed by clinical global evaluation of disease control (CGE-DC) questionnaire, investigator therapeutic decision, and international guidelines. Control status was not determined at baseline for 13 patients. Since 9 patients were enrolled retrospectively, all presented analyses are based on the prospective population (N = 227). Patients were assessed over a 2-year follow-up period. Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to investigate how SAGIT components at baseline (signs/symptoms [S], associated comorbidities [A], growth hormone levels [G], insulin-like growth factor 1 levels [I], tumor features [T]) discriminate between controlled and non-controlled acromegaly. Results Baseline mean subscores S, G, I, and T were significantly lower in patients with CGE-DC controlled vs CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly. SAGIT components I and G for CGE-DC and S, A, G, I, and T for the clinician’s therapeutic decision were retained by CART analyses. For international guidelines, only SAGIT component I was retained. The risk for undergoing ≥ 1 treatment change during the study was 3.44 times greater for CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly relative to CGE-DC controlled acromegaly. Conclusion The SAGIT instrument is a valid and sensitive tool to comprehensively and accurately assess acromegaly severity.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes

Archive ouverte | Melmed, Shlomo | CCSD

International audience

Pituitary Neoplasm Nomenclature Workshop: Does Adenoma Stand the Test of Time?

Archive ouverte | Ho, Ken | CCSD

International audience. Abstract The WHO Classification of Endocrine Tumours designates pituitary neoplasms as adenomas. A proposed nomenclature change to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) has been met with ...

Treatment Patterns, Adherence, Persistence, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Acromegaly: A Real-World Analysis

Archive ouverte | Fleseriu, Maria | CCSD

International audience. Treatment of acromegaly is multimodal for many patients, and medical treatments include somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), dopamine agonists (DAs), and growth hormone receptor antagonists ...

Chargement des enrichissements...