463P Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the clinical presentation and outcomes of newly referred breast cancer cases at AP-HP: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

Archive ouverte

Priou, Sonia | Guével, E. | Lamé, Guillaume | Wassermann, J. | Bey, R. | Uzan, C. | Chatellier, G. | Belkacémi, Y. | Tannier, X. | Guillerm, S. | Flicoteaux, R. | Gligorov, J. | Cohen, A. | Benderra, M-A. | Teixeira, L. | Daniel, C. | Tournigand, Christophe | Kempf, Emmanuelle

Edité par CCSD -

International audience. BackgroundThe Sars Cov-2 pandemic and the national lockdowns disrupted healthcare systems in 2020. We assessed the impact on care pathways and clinical outcomes for new breast cancers (BCs) in Paris area.MethodsWe performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study on the data warehouse of Greater Paris University Hospitals (APHP). We identified pts newly referred with BC between Jan 2019, and Dec 2020. We assessed the delays of care management, the initial tumor stage from pathology and baseline PET/CT and CT-scan reports, and the trt categories: breast surgery, exclusive systemic therapy, exclusive radiation therapy, or exclusive best supportive care (BSC). We calculated pts’ 1-year overall survival (OS) and compared indicators for 2019 and 2020.ResultsIn 2019 and 2020, 2,303 and 2,258 patients were newly referred with a BC diag among whom 2,055 and 1,988 female patients underwent a BC treatment, respectively. During the 1st and the 2nd lockdowns, the number of BC diag varied by -18% and by +23% compared to the same periods of 2019. Between 2019 and 2020, the rate of de novo metastatic disease (respectively 15% and 15%, p=0.95) did not differ, neither did the pTNM and the ypTNM distributions (p=0.37 and p=0.31). The time from 1st multidisciplinary meeting to trt did not differ (p=0.23). Pts’ access to reconstructive surgery (15% and 17%, p=0.08) and distribution across trt categories did not vary: tumor resection (73% and 72%), exclusive systemic trt (13% and 14%), exclusive radiation trt (9% and 9%), and exclusive BSC (5% and 5%) (p=0.8), respectively. Age-based subgroup analyses yielded to similar results (p=0,95). The rate of neoadjuvant trt for resected pts was lower in 2019 (16%) compared to 2020 (20%) (p=0.02), especially in patients aged < 50 years (15% vs 21%, p=0,01), respectively. The 1-year OS rates in 2019 vs. 2020 were 99.3% vs. 98.9% (HR=0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.2), 72.6% vs. 76.6% (HR=1.28; 95% CI, 0.95-1.72), 96.6% vs. 97.8% (HR=1.09; 95% CI, 0.61-1.94), and 15.5% vs. 15.1% (HR=0.99; 95% CI, 0.72-1.37), in the trt groups, respectively.ConclusionsDespite an initial decrease in new BCs, we did not observe any tumor stage shift, and OS did not vary significantly during Sars-Cov-2.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Valeur ajoutée des algorithmes de traitement automatique du langage: exemple de la prise en charge du cancer du pancréas à l'Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris

Archive ouverte | Priou, Sonia | CCSD

International audience. IntroductionL'impact de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur le retard de prise en charge des cancers est débattue. Nous étudions l'intérêt des algorithmes de traitement automatique du langage (TAL) e...

1690O Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on the initial clinical presentation of new solid cancer diagnoses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Archive ouverte | Marty, S. | CCSD

International audience. BackgroundSars Cov-2-related disruptions to health services might have impaired the initial clinical presentation of new solid tumor patients. The aim of this systematic review was to compare...

Utilisation du traitement automatique du langage pour le calcul et le suivi d'indicateurs de qualité de la prise en charge du cancer du sein

Archive ouverte | Guével, E. | CCSD

International audience. IntroductionL'obtention des certifications qualité impose le recueil d'indicateurs de qualité et de sécurité des soins (IQSS) définis par des groupes d'experts. Notre objectif est de détermin...

Chargement des enrichissements...