How valid are proxy assessment of mental health and sleep comorbidities of patients with epilepsy using standardized questionnaires?

Archive ouverte

Serrand, Chris | Faucanié, Marie | Jaussent, Audrey | Crespel, Arielle | Denuelle, Marie | Bartolomei, Fabrice | Verceuil, Laurent | Derambure, Philippe | Tyvaert, Louise | Marchal, Cécile | Landre, Elisabeth | Szurhaj, William | Mura, Thibault | Navarro, Vincent | Rheims, Sylvain | Picot, Marie-Christine

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier -

The raw data after de-identification can be shared upon individual request to Marie-Christine Picot: mc-picot@chu-montpellier.fr.. International audience. Background: The study aimed to determine the level of agreement between patients with epilepsy and their proxies when assessing psychiatric comorbidities, sleep disorders, and medication adherence using standardized questionnaires. Methods: : This agreement study is an ancillary analysis of the PRERIES study, a matched case-control study exploring SUDEP risk factors. Controls aged 15 years and older, with active epilepsy or in remission for less than 5 years were recruited between 01/01/2011 and 03/31/2019. An interview was carried out by a trained psychologist on both the patient and a proxy-respondent. During these independent interviews, the following comorbidities were explored: psychiatric comorbidities using the MINI, the STAI- Y2 and NDDI-E scales, sleep disorders with the SDQ-SA and Epworth scales and medication adherence. Level of agreement between patient and their proxy was estimated using Gwet's AC1&2. Results: Among the 107 patient–proxy dyads recruited, proxy respondents were mainly family members (65.4%) or spouses (30.8%). Exploration of present major depression showed excellent agreement at 0.81 [0.65;0.97], as well as exploration of dysthymia at 0.96 [0.61;1]. Suicidal risk evaluation had a lesser agreement at 0.77 [0.60;0.94]. Agreement on anxiety was moderate 0.5 [0.38;0.62]. For sleep disorder, SDQ-SA presented a better agreement than the Epworth questionnaire with respectively 0.73 [0.51;0.95] and 0.45 [0.26;0.63]. For medication adherence, the overall agreement rate was excellent (0.90 [0.78;1]). Conclusion: Exploration of potential risk factors through families can give valuable and relatively robust information, especially if the respondent lives with the patient, and should be retrieved, when possible, in usual clinical setting.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Cost-effectiveness analysis of epilepsy surgery in a controlled cohort of adult patients with intractable partial epilepsy: A 5-year follow-up study

Archive ouverte | Picot, Marie-Christine | CCSD

International audience. OBJECTIVE:Despite its well-known effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness of epilepsy surgery has never been demonstrated in France. We compared cost-effectiveness between resective surgery and ...

French guidelines on stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)

Archive ouverte | Isnard, Jean | CCSD

International audience

French guidelines on stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)

Archive ouverte | Isnard, Jean | CCSD

International audience. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was designed and developed in the 1960s in France by J. Talairach and J. Bancaud. It is an invasive method of exploration for drug-resistant focal epilepsi...

Chargement des enrichissements...