National soil data in EU countries, where do we stand?

Archive ouverte

Cornu, Sophie | Keesstra, Saskia | Bispo, Antonio | Fantappie, Maria | van Egmond, Fenny | Smreczak, Bozena | Wawer, Rafał | Pavlů, Lenka | Sobocká, Jaroslava | Bakacsi, Zsófia | Farkas-Iványi, Kinga | Molnár, Sándor | Møller, Anders Bjørn | Madenoglu, Sevinc | Feiziene, Dalia | Oorts, Katrien | Schneider, Florian | Gonçalves, Maria da Conceição | Mano, Raquel | Garland, Gina | Skalský, Rastislav | O'Sullivan, Lilian | Kasparinskis, Raimonds | Chenu, Claire

Edité par CCSD ; Wiley -

International audience. At European scale, soil characteristics are needed to evaluate soil quality, soil health and soi l-based ecosystem services in the context of the European Green Deal. While some soil databases exist at the European scale, a much larger wealth of data is present in individual European countries, al l owing a more detailed soil assessment. There is thus an urgent and crucial need to combine these data at t h e European scale. In the frame of a large European Joint Programme on agricultural soils launched by the European Commission, a survey was conducted in the spring of 2020, i n the 24 European participating countries to assess the existing soil data sources, focusing on agricultural soils. The survey will become a contribution to the European Soil Observatory, launched in December 2020, which aims to collect metadata of soil databases related to all kind of land uses, including fores t and urban soils. Based upon a comprehensive questionnaire, 170 soil databases were identified at local, regional and national scales. Soil parameters were divided into f i ve groups: 1. main soil parametersaccording to the Global Soil Map specifications; 2. other soil chemical parameters; 3. oth e r physical parameters; 4. other pedological parameters; and 5. soil biological features. A classification based onthe environmental zones of Europe was used to distinguish the climatic zones. This survey shows that while most of the main pedological and chemical parameters are included in more than 70 % of the country soil databases, water content, contamination with organic pollutants and biological parameters are the least frequently reported parameters. Such differences will have conse que nce s when developing an EU policy on soil health as proposed under the EU soil strategy for 2023 and using the data to derive soil health indicators. Many differences in the me thods used in collecting, preparing, and analysing the soils were found, thus requiring harmonisation procedures and more cooperation among countries and with the EU to use the data at the European scale Additionally, choosing harmonized and useful interpretation and threshold values f or EU soil indicators may be challenging due to the different methods used and the wide variety of soil land-use and climate combinations influencing possible thresholds. The temporal scale of the soil databases reported is also extremely wide, starting from the ‘20s of the 20th century.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

National soil data in EU countries, where do we stand?

Archive ouverte | Cornu, Sophie, S. | CCSD

International audience. At the European scale, soil characteristics are needed to evaluate soil quality, soil health and soil-based ecosystem services in the context of the European Green Deal. While some soil datab...

National soil data in EU countries, where do we stand?

Archive ouverte | Cornu, Sophie, S. | CCSD

International audience. At the European scale, soil characteristics are needed to evaluate soil quality, soil health and soil-based ecosystem services in the context of the European Green Deal. While some soil datab...

High-resolution thematic soil mapping at EU level based on the combined use of LUCAS and national soil monitoring data in the framework of the EJP SOIL project

Archive ouverte | Tondini, Elena | CCSD

International audience. The EJP SOIL project aims to provide the research and policy-making community with detailed and harmonised EU-wide thematic maps of agricultural soils, based on a common methodology, to impro...

Chargement des enrichissements...