Impact of data extraction errors in meta-analyses on the association between depression and peripheral inflammatory biomarkers: An umbrella review

Archive ouverte

Lee, San | Lee, Keum-Hwa | Park, Kyungmee | Park, Sungjong | Kim, Won-Jae | Lee, Jinhee | Kronbichler, Andreas | Smith, Lee | Solmi, Marco | Stubbs, Brendon | Koyanagi, Ai | Jacob, Louis | Stickley, Andrew | Thompson, Trevor | Dragioti, Elena | Oh, Hans Y. | Brunoni, André Russowski | Carvalho, Andrè Ferrer | Radua, Joaquim | An, Suk-Kyoon | Namkoong, Kee | Lee, Eun-Gae | Shin, Jae Il I. | Fusar-Poli, Paolo

Edité par CCSD ; Cambridge University Press (CUP) -

International audience. Background Accumulating evidence suggests that alterations in inflammatory biomarkers are important in depression. However, previous meta-analyses disagree on these associations, and errors in data extraction may account for these discrepancies. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to 14 January 2020. Meta-analyses of observational studies examining the association between depression and levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 1-β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were eligible. Errors were classified as follows: incorrect sample sizes, incorrectly used standard deviation, incorrect participant inclusion, calculation error, or analysis with insufficient data. We determined their impact on the results after correction thereof. Results Errors were noted in 14 of the 15 meta-analyses included. Across 521 primary studies, 118 (22.6%) showed the following errors: incorrect sample sizes (20 studies, 16.9%), incorrect use of standard deviation (35 studies, 29.7%), incorrect participant inclusion (7 studies, 5.9%), calculation errors (33 studies, 28.0%), and analysis with insufficient data (23 studies, 19.5%). After correcting these errors, 11 (29.7%) out of 37 pooled effect sizes changed by a magnitude of more than 0.1, ranging from 0.11 to 1.15. The updated meta-analyses showed that elevated levels of TNF- α, IL-6, CRP, but not IL-1β, are associated with depression. Conclusions These findings show that data extraction errors in meta-analyses can impact findings. Efforts to reduce such errors are important in studies of the association between depression and peripheral inflammatory biomarkers, for which high heterogeneity and conflicting results have been continuously reported. Copyright

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Differential expression of MicroRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Archive ouverte | Yoon, Sojung | CCSD

International audience. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) results in progressive cognitive decline owing to the accumulation of amyloid plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have attracted attention as a pu...

Environmental risk factors, protective factors, and peripheral biomarkers for ADHD: an umbrella review

Archive ouverte | Kim, Jae-Han | CCSD

International audience. Background: Many potential environmental risk factors, environmental protective factors, and peripheral biomarkers for ADHD have been investigated, but the consistency and magnitude of their ...

Consumption of Fish and ω-3 Fatty Acids and Cancer Risk: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies

Archive ouverte | Lee, Keum-Hwa | CCSD

International audience. Multiple studies have suggested that ω-3 fatty acid intake may have a protective effect on cancer risk; however, its true association with cancer risk remains controversial. We performed an u...

Chargement des enrichissements...