When a joint model should be preferred over a linear mixed model for analysis of longitudinal health-related quality of life data in cancer clinical trials

Archive ouverte

Touraine, Célia | Cuer, Benjamin | Conroy, Thierry | Juzyna, Beata | Gourgou, Sophie | Mollevi, Caroline

Edité par CCSD ; BioMed Central -

International audience. Background: Patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are increasingly used as endpoints in randomized cancer clinical trials. However, the patients often drop out so that observation of the HRQoL longitudinal outcome ends prematurely, leading to monotone missing data. The patients may drop out for various reasons including occurrence of toxicities, disease progression, or may die. In case of informative dropout, the usual linear mixed model analysis will produce biased estimates. Unbiased estimates cannot be obtained unless the dropout is jointly modeled with the longitudinal outcome, for instance by using a joint model composed of a linear mixed (sub)model linked to a survival (sub)model. Our objective was to investigate in a clinical trial context the consequences of using the most frequently used linear mixed model, the random intercept and slope model, rather than its corresponding joint model.Methods: We first illustrate and compare the models on data of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We then perform a more formal comparison through a simulation study.Results: From the application, we derived hypotheses on the situations in which biases arise and on their nature. Through the simulation study, we confirmed and complemented these hypotheses and provided general explanations of the bias mechanisms.Conclusions In particular, this article reveals how the linear mixed model fails in the typical situation where poor HRQoL is associated with an increased risk of dropout and the experimental treatment improves survival. Unlike the joint model, in this situation the linear mixed model will overestimate the HRQoL in both arms, but not equally, misestimating the difference between the HRQoL trajectories of the two arms to the disadvantage of the experimental arm.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Flexible modeling of longitudinal health-related quality of life data accounting for informative dropout in a cancer clinical trial

Archive ouverte | Winter, Audrey | CCSD

International audience. Purpose.A joint modeling approach is recommended for analysis of longitudinal health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data in the presence of potentially informative dropouts. However, the lin...

Joint modelling with competing risks of dropout for longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials

Archive ouverte | Cuer, Benjamin | CCSD

International audience. Purpose: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials. Analysis of HRQoL longitudinal data is plagued by missing data, notably due to dropout. Joi...

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER PRODIGE 23): Health-related quality of life longitudinal analysis

Archive ouverte | Bascoul-Mollevi, Caroline | CCSD

International audience. Background: Results from the phase 3 PRODIGE 23 study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with mFOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy improved disease-free survival compared wi...

Chargement des enrichissements...