Acceptability of Second-Line Antidepressant Medications Using Filled Prescription Sequences in a Nationwide Cohort Study

Archive ouverte

Ouazana-Vedrines, Charles | Lesuffleur, Thomas | Denis, Pierre | Hoertel, Nicolas | Olekhnovitch, Romain | Olfson, Mark | Blanco, Carlos | Limosin, Frédéric | Rachas, Antoine | Tuppin, Philippe | Lemogne, Cèdric

Edité par CCSD -

International audience. Background: Although about half of patients do not respond to a first-line antidepressant medication, there is no consensus on the best second-line option. The aim of this nationwide population-based study was to rank antidepressants according to their relative acceptability (ie, efficacy and tolerability) using filled prescription sequences after failure of first treatment. Methods: About 1.2 million people were identified as new antidepressant users in the French national health data system in 2011. The inclusion criterion was having at least 2 filled prescriptions of a second-line treatment after a filled prescription of a first-line treatment, resulting in 63,726 participants. The outcome was clinical acceptability as measured by the continuation/change ratio for second-line treatment. Continuation sequence was defined as at least 2 refills of the same treatment. Change sequence was defined as at least 1 filled prescription of another antidepressant. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed through multivariable binary logistic regressions. Results: Intraclass switch had a better acceptability than interclass switch (aOR [95% CI]: 1.23 [1.20-1.28]). According to the first-line treatment, intraclass switch remained more acceptable for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors only (1.37 [1.31-1.42]). For α2 blockers and tricyclic agents, combination antidepressant therapy was the most acceptable second-line option (1.59 [1.27-2.01] and 2.53 [1.53-4.04], respectively), whereas for serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors there was no significant difference between the strategies. For other antidepressants, intraclass switch had lower acceptability than interclass switch (0.70 [0.51-0.95]). Conclusions: Administrative claim databases may help with ranking acceptability of second-line treatments in real world settings and complement randomized controlled trials in informing clinicians about the most acceptable second-line options according to the first-line treatment.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Using filled prescription sequences to rank antidepressants according to their acceptability in the general population: The Constances cohort

Archive ouverte | Olekhnovitch, Romain | CCSD

International audience. Ranking antidepressants according to their acceptability (i.e. a combination of both efficacy and tolerability) in the general population may help choosing the best first-line medication. Thi...

Medications Modulating the Acid Sphingomyelinase/Ceramide System and 28-Day Mortality among Patients with SARS-CoV-2: An Observational Study

Archive ouverte | Hoertel, Nicolas | CCSD

International audience. Prior evidence indicates the potential central role of the acid sphingomyelinase (ASM)/ ceramide system in the infection of cells with SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a multicenter retrospective obs...

A comprehensive model of predictors of suicide attempt in individuals with panic disorder: Results from a national 3-year prospective study

Archive ouverte | Scheer, Valentin | CCSD

International audience. Objective: People with panic disorder are at increased risk of suicide. Multiple factors influence their risk suggesting a need to combine them into an integrative model to develop more effec...

Chargement des enrichissements...