Review of industry reports on EU priority tobacco additives part A: Main outcomes and conclusions

Archive ouverte

Havermans, Anne | Mallock, Nadja | Zervas, Efthimios | Caillé-Garnier, Stéphanie | Mansuy, Thibault | Michel, Cécile | Pennings, Jeroen, L A | Schulz, Thomas | Schwarze, Per, E | Solimini, Renata | Tassin, Jean-Pol | Vardavas, Constantine, I | Merino, Miguel | Pauwels, Charlotte, G G M | van Nierop, Lotte, E | Lambré, Claude | Bolling, Anette, K

Edité par CCSD ; E.U European Publishing -

International audience. The European Union Tobacco Products Directive (EU TPD) mandates enhanced reporting obligations for tobacco manufacturers regarding 15 priority additives. Within the Joint Action on Tobacco Control (JATC), a review panel of independent experts was appointed for the scientific evaluation of the additive reports submitted by a consortium of 12 tobacco manufacturers. As required by the TPD, the reports were evaluated based on their comprehensiveness, methodology and conclusions. In addition, we evaluated the chemical, toxicological, addictive, inhalation facilitating and flavoring properties of the priority additives based on the submitted reports, supplemented by the panel's expert knowledge and some independent literature. The industry concluded that none of the additives is associated with concern. Due to significant methodological limitations, we question the scientific validity of these conclusions and conclude that they are not warranted. Our review demonstrates that many issues regarding toxicity, addictiveness and attractiveness of the additives have not been sufficiently addressed, and therefore concerns remain. For example, menthol facilitates inhalation by activation of the cooling receptor TRPM8. The addition of sorbitol and guar gum leads to a significant increase of aldehydes that may contribute to toxicity and addictiveness. Titanium dioxide particles (aerodynamic diameter <10 µm) are legally classified as carcinogenic when inhaled. For diacetyl no report was provided. Overall, the industry reports were not comprehensive, and the information presented provides an insufficient basis for the regulation of most additives. We, therefore, advise MS to consider alternative approaches such as the precautionary principle.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Review of industry reports on EU priority tobacco additives part B: Methodological limitations

Archive ouverte | Bolling, Anette | CCSD

International audience. The Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) defines enhanced reporting obligations applying to 15 priority additives added to cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco. A consortium of 12 international t...

Étude sur les pratiques de consommation des usagers de cigarettes électroniques en France - Appui à la caractérisation des expositions

Archive ouverte | Guerbet, Michel | CCSD

Citation suggéréeAnses. (2022). Étude sur les pratiques de consommation des usagers de cigarettes électroniques en France : appui à la caractérisation des expositions. (saisine 2020-SA-0017). Maisons-Alfort : Anses, 68 p.. ...

Priorisation des substances chimiques à rechercher dans les émissions des produits du vapotage en vue de l’évaluation des risques sanitaires. Priorisation des substances chimiques à rechercher dans les émissions des produits du vapotage en vue de l’évaluation des risques sanitaires: Avis de l’AnsesRapport d’expertise collective

Archive ouverte | Guerbet, Michel | CCSD

Citation suggérée:Anses (2021). Priorisation des substances chimiques à rechercher dans les émissions des produits du vapotage en vue de l’évaluation des risques sanitaires. Rapport d’expertise collective (saisine 2020-SA-0016). M...

Chargement des enrichissements...