Sensitivity of the STAT-VIEW Rapid Self-Test and Implications for Use during Acute HIV Infection

Archive ouverte

Boukli, Narjis | Boyd, Anders | Wendremaire, Noémie | Girard, Pierre-Marie | Bottero, Julie | Morand-Joubert, Laurence

Edité par CCSD -

International audience. Objectives HIV testing is an important step towards diminishing incident infections. Rapid self-tests whose use is becoming more common in France could help increase access to testing, yet could fail to diagnose HIV during acute HIV infection (AHI). The aim of the present study was to evaluate HIV-detection sensitivity of a commonly used rapid self-test (STAT-VIEW HIV1/2), compared with another point-of-care rapid test (INSTI), among patients presenting with AHI. Methods Individuals tested at Saint-Antoine Hospital (Paris, France) with negative or indeterminate western blot (WB) results and detectable HIV-RNA were included. Rapid tests were performed retrospectively on stored serum. Patients with and without reactive rapid tests were compared, while probability of having a reactive test was modelled across infection duration using logistic regression. Results Of the 40 patients with AHI, 23 (57.5%) had a reactive STAT-VIEW rapid test. Patients with non-reactive versus reactive tests had a significantly shorter median time since infection (p=0.01), time since onset of symptoms (p=0.009), higher proportion with Fiebig stage III versus IV (p=0.003), negative WB results (p=0.007), higher HIV-RNA levels (p=0.001) and lower CD4+ and\,CD8+ cell\,count (p=0.03, p<0.001, respectively). When examining sensitivity over the course of AHI duration, the probability of HIV detection was 75.5% at 5\,weeks from HIV transmission. The INSTI provided similar results with respect to proportion of reactive tests (62.5%), determinants for non-reactive test and probability of HIV detection at 5\,weeks of infection (85.0%). Conclusions Over half of AHI patients had reactive serology using the STAT-VIEW rapid self-test when performed on serum samples. Considering that detection sensitivity increased substantially over infection time, individuals should not rely on a negative result to accurately exclude HIV infection within at least 5 weeks of potential HIV exposure. Notwithstanding strong recommendations against rapid test use during AHI, some utility in detecting HIV is observed 5\textendash 12 weeks after transmission.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Utility of HIV-1 DNA genotype in determining antiretroviral resistance in patients with low or undetectable HIV RNA viral loads

Archive ouverte | Boukli, Narjis | CCSD

International audience. Objectives: To investigate the extent to which drug resistance can be evaluated from proviral HIV-1 DNA genotype compared with RNA genotype at different timepoints.Patients and methods: In HI...

A 4-days-on and 3-days-off maintenance treatment strategy for adults with HIV-1 (ANRS 170 QUATUOR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel, non-inferiority trial

Archive ouverte | Landman, Roland | CCSD

International audience

Testing for Hepatitis B Virus Alone Does Not Increase Vaccine Coverage in Non-Immunized Persons

Archive ouverte | Boyd, Anders | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...