Endoscopic internal drainage for the management of leak, fistula, and collection after sleeve gastrectomy: our experience in 617 consecutive patients

Archive ouverte

Donatelli, Gianfranco | Spota, Andrea | Cereatti, Fabrizio | Granieri, Stefano | Dagher, Ibrahim | Chiche, Renaud | Catheline, Jean-Marc | Pourcher, Guillaume | Rebibo, Lionel | Calabrese, Daniela | Msika, Simon | Dammaro, Carmelisa | Tranchart, Hadrien | Lainas, Panagiotis | Tuszynski, Thierry | Pacini, Filippo | Arienzo, Roberto | Chevallier, Jean-Marc | Trelles, Nelson | Lazzati, Andrea | Paolino, Luca | Papini, Federica | Torcivia, Adriana | Genser, Laurent | Arapis, Kostas | Soprani, Antoine | Randone, Bruto | Chosidow, Denis | Bouillot, Jean-Luc | Marmuse, Jean-Pierre | Dumont, Jean-Loup

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier -

International audience. Background: Endoscopy plays a pivotal role in the management of adverse events (AE) following bariatric surgery. Leaks, fistulae, and post-operative collection after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may occur in up to 10% of cases. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic internal drainage (EID) for the management of leak, fistula, and collection following SG. Setting: Retrospective, observational, single center study on patients referred from several bariatric surgery departments to an endoscopic referral center. Methods: EID was used as first-line treatment for the management of leaks, fistulae, and collections. Leaks and fistulae were treated with double pigtail stent (DPS) deployment in order to guarantee internal drainage and second intention cavity obliteration. Collections were treated with endoscropic ultrasound (EUS)-guided deployment of DPS or lumen apposing metal stents. Results: A total of 617 patients (83.3% female; mean age, 43.1 yr) were enrolled in the study for leak (n = 300, 48.6%), fistula (n = 285, 46.2%), and collection (n = 32, 5.2%). Median follow-up was 19.5 months. Overall clinical success was 84.7% whereas 15.3% of cases required revisional surgery after EID failure. Clinical success according to type of AE was 89.5%, 78.5%, and 90% for leak, fistula, and collection, respectively. A total of 10 of 547 (1.8%) presented a recurrence during follow-up. A total of 28 (4.5%) AE related to the endoscopic treatment occurred. At univariate logistic regression predictors of failure were: fistula (OR 2.012), combined endoscopic approach (OR 2.319), need for emergency surgery (OR 1.755), and previous endoscopic treatment (OR 4.818). Conclusion: Early EID for the management of leak, fistula, and post-operative collection after SG seems a safe and effective first-line approach with good long-term results. (C) 2021 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Endoscopic Management of Bariatric Surgery Complications According to a Standardized Algorithm

Archive ouverte | Spota, Andrea | CCSD

International audience. Background and Aims Endoscopy is effective in management of bariatric surgery (BS) adverse events (AEs) but a comprehensive evaluation of long-term results is lacking. Our aim is to assess th...

Endoscopy management of sleeve gastrectomy stenosis: what we learned from 202 consecutive patients

Archive ouverte | D’alessandro, Alessandra | CCSD

International audience

Comparison of Repeat Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Case of Weight Loss Failure After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Archive ouverte | Antonopulos, Christos | CCSD

International audience. Background Few series are available on the results of repeat sleeve gastrectomy (re-SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) performed to manage the failure of primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG)....

Chargement des enrichissements...