Efficacy and Safety of Rovalpituzumab Tesirine Compared With Topotecan as Second-Line Therapy in DLL3-High SCLC: Results From the Phase 3 TAHOE Study

Archive ouverte

Blackhall, Fiona | Jao, Kevin | Greillier, Laurent | Cho, Byoung Chul | Penkov, Konstantin | Reguart, Noemi | Majem, Margarita | Nackaerts, Kristiaan | Syrigos, Konstantinos | Hansen, Karin | Schuette, Wolfgang | Cetnar, Jeremy | Cappuzzo, Federico | Okamoto, Isamu | Erman, Mustafa | Langer, Seppo | Kato, Terufumi | Groen, Harry | Sun, Zhaowen | Luo, Yan | Tanwani, Poonam | Caffrey, Laura | Komarnitsky, Philip | Reinmuth, Niels

Edité par CCSD ; Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins -

International audience. Introduction: DLL3, an atypical Notch ligand, is expressed in SCLC tumors but is not detectable in normal adult tissues. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate containing a DLL3-targeting antibody tethered to a cytotoxic agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine by means of a protease-cleavable linker. The efficacy and safety of Rova-T compared with topotecan as second-line therapy in patients with SCLC expressing high levels of DLL3 (DLL3-high) was evaluated.Methods: The TAHOE study was an open-label, two-to-one randomized, phase 3 study comparing Rova-T with topotecan as second-line therapy in DLL3-high advanced or metastatic SCLC. Rova-T (0.3 mg/kg) was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 42-day cycle for two cycles, with two additional cycles available to patients who met protocol-defined criteria for continued dosing. Topotecan (1.5 mg/m2) was administered intravenously on days 1 to 5 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS).Results: Patients randomized to Rova-T (n = 296) and topotecan (n = 148) were included in the efficacy analyses. The median age was 64 years, and 77% had the extensive disease at initial diagnosis. The median OS (95% confidence interval) was 6.3 months (5.6-7.3) in the Rova-T arm and 8.6 months (7.7-10.1) in the topotecan arm (hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.82]). An independent data monitoring committee recommended that enrollment be discontinued because of the shorter OS observed with Rova-T compared with topotecan. Safety profiles for both drugs were consistent with previous reports.Conclusions: Compared with topotecan, which is the current standard second-line chemotherapy, Rova-T exhibited an inferior OS and higher rates of serosal effusions, photosensitivity reaction, and peripheral edema in patients with SCLC. A considerable unmet therapeutic need remains in this population.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Rovalpituzumab Tesirine as a Maintenance Therapy Following First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the Phase 3 MERU Study

Archive ouverte | Johnson, Melissa L | CCSD

International audience. Introduction - Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3, an atypical Notch ligand expressed in SCLC tumors. We evaluated the efficacy of Rova-T versus pla...

Tepotinib in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations

Archive ouverte | Paik, Paul | CCSD

International audience

Overall Survival From the EORTC LCG-1613 APPLE Trial of Osimertinib Versus Gefitinib Followed by Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR -Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Archive ouverte | Remon, Jordi | CCSD

International audience. Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-prima...

Chargement des enrichissements...