Benefits and adverse effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Archive ouverte

Charuel, Elodie | Menini, Thibault | Bedhomme, Sabrina | Pereira, Bruno | Piñol-Domenech, Nathalie | Bouchant, Suzy | Boussageon, Rémy | Bœuf‐gibot, Sylvaine | Vaillant‐roussel, Helene

Edité par CCSD ; Wiley -

International audience. This review aims to assess the benefits and adverse effects of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure, with a focus on important patient outcomes. A systematic review was conducted of double- blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sacubi -tril/valsartan versus a reference drug, in heart failure patients with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction, published in French or English. Searches were undertaken of Medline, Cochrane Central, and Embase. The primary outcomes were all- cause mortality and adverse events. From 2 082 articles analyzed, 5 were included. For all- cause mortality, the absolute numbers for HFrEF (2 RCTs, 4627 pa -tients) were 16% on sacubitril/valsartan and 18% on enalapril, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.85 [CI =0.78, 0.93], and 13% vs 14% in with HFpEF (2 RCTs, 5097 patients), with no statistical difference. Under the Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, the evidence for HFrEF patients was of moderate quality. For HFrEF patients, an increased risk of symptomatic hypo -tension and angioedema (low quality of evidence) was shown. There was no statisti -cal difference for the risk of hyperkalemia or worsening renal function. There was a protective RR (0.50 [0.34, 0.75]) for worsening renal function for patients with HFpEF, with a high quality of evidence despite similar absolute numbers (1.4% vs. 2.8%). To keep in mind for shared decision- making, sacubitril/valsartan reduces all- cause mor -tality in HFrEF patients but for HFpEF further data are needed. Take into considera-tion the small number of studies to date to assess the risks.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB) project: a method of interpreting randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present patients with robust benefit-risk assessments. Projet Rebuild the Evidence Base

Archive ouverte | Vaillant-Roussel, Hélène | CCSD

National audience. Introduction. La médecine fondée sur les preuves (EBM) est la pierre angulaire de la décision médicale partagée. Le public mérite des informations claires, transparentes et dignes de confiance sur...

Project rebuild the evidence base (REB): A method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients

Archive ouverte | Boussageon, Rémy | CCSD

International audience

Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients

Archive ouverte | Boussageon, Rémy | CCSD

International audience. Evidence-based medicine is the cornerstone of shared-decision making in healthcare today. The public deserves clear, transparent and trust-worthy information on drug efficacy. Yet today, many...

Chargement des enrichissements...