Pharmacological treatment profiles in the FACE-BD cohort: An unsupervised machine learning study, applied to a nationwide bipolar cohort✰

Archive ouverte

Brodeur, Sébastien | Terrisse, Hugo | Pouchon, Arnaud | Godin, Ophelia | Aouizerate, Bruno | Aubin, Valerie | Bellivier, Frank | Belzeaux, Raoul | Bougerol, Thierry | Courtet, Philippe | Dubertret, Caroline | Gard, Sebastien | Haffen, Emmanuel | Henry, Chantal | Leboyer, Marion | Olié, Emilie | Roux, Paul | Samalin, Ludovic | Schwan, Raymund | Etain, Bruno | Bosson, Jean-Luc | Polosan, Mircea

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier -

International audience. Background: Despite thorough and validated clinical guidelines based on bipolar disorders subtypes, large pharmacological treatment heterogeneity remains in these patients. There is limited knowledge about the different treatment combinations used and their influence on patient outcomes. We attempted to determine profiles of patients based on their treatments and to understand the clinical characteristics associated with these treatment profiles.Methods: This multicentre longitudinal study was performed on a French nationwide bipolar cohort database. We performed hierarchical agglomerative clustering to search for clusters of individuals based on their treatments during the first year following inclusion. We then compared patient clinical characteristics according to these clusters.Results: Four groups were identified among the 1795 included patients: group 1 ("heterogeneous" n = 1099), group 2 ("lithium" n = 265), group 3 ("valproate" n = 268), and group 4 ("lamotrigine" n = 163). Proportion of bipolar 1 disorder, in groups 1 to 4 were: 48.2%, 57.0%, 48.9% and 32.5%. Groups 1 and 4 had greater functional impact at baseline and a less favorable clinical and functioning evolution at one-year follow-up, especially on GAF and FAST scales.Limitations: The one-year period used for the analysis of mood stabilizing treatments remains short in the evolution of bipolar disorder.Conclusions: Treatment profiles are associated with functional evolution of patients and were not clearly determined by bipolar subtypes. These profiles seem to group together common patient phenotypes. These findings do not seem to be influenced by the duration of disease prior to inclusion and neither by the number of treatments used during the follow-up period.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Pharmacological treatment profiles in the FACE-BD cohort: Treatment description and complete data for bipolar subtypes

Archive ouverte | Brodeur, Sébastien | CCSD

International audience. In the current study, we provide the list of pharmacological interventions applied during the one-year follow-up period of the Pharmacological treatment profiles in the FACE-BD cohort study. ...

Does BioAge identify accelerated aging in individuals with bipolar disorder? An exploratory study in the FACE‐BD cohort

Archive ouverte | Etain, Bruno | CCSD

International audience. Background: Individuals with bipolar disorders (BD) have an estimated loss of life expectancy around 10-15 years. Several laboratory-measured biomarkers of accelerated aging exist (e.g., telo...

Factors associated with lamotrigine concentration/dose ratio in individuals with bipolar disorders

Archive ouverte | Chouchana, Margot | CCSD

International audience. Monitoring of lamotrigine levels is recommended in epilepsy. However, in bipolar disorders (BD), no study has described the therapeutic range in daily practice and factors being associated to...

Chargement des enrichissements...