Global tropical dry forest extent and cover: A comparative study of bioclimatic definitions using two climatic data sets

Archive ouverte

Ocón, Jonathan Pando | Ibanez, Thomas | Franklin, Janet | Pau, Stephanie | Keppel, Gunnar | Rivas-Torres, Gonzalo | Shin, Michael Edward | Gillespie, Thomas, Welch

Edité par CCSD ; Public Library of Science -

International audience. There is a debate concerning the definition and extent of tropical dry forest biome and vegetation type at a global spatial scale. We identify the potential extent of the tropical dry forest biome based on bioclimatic definitions and climatic data sets to improve global estimates of distribution, cover, and change. We compared four bioclimatic definitions of the tropical dry forest biome–Murphy and Lugo, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), DryFlor, aridity index–using two climatic data sets: WorldClim and Climatologies at High-resolution for the Earth’s Land Surface Areas (CHELSA). We then compared each of the eight unique combinations of bioclimatic definitions and climatic data sets using 540 field plots identified as tropical dry forest from a literature search and evaluated the accuracy of World Wildlife Fund tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forest ecoregions. We used the definition and climate data that most closely matched field data to calculate forest cover in 2000 and change from 2001 to 2020. Globally, there was low agreement (< 58%) between bioclimatic definitions and WWF ecoregions and only 40% of field plots fell within these ecoregions. FAO using CHELSA had the highest agreement with field plots (81%) and was not correlated with the biome extent. Using the FAO definition with CHELSA climatic data set, we estimate 4,931,414 km 2 of closed canopy (≥ 40% forest cover) tropical dry forest in 2000 and 4,369,695 km 2 in 2020 with a gross loss of 561,719 km 2 (11.4%) from 2001 to 2020. Tropical dry forest biome extent varies significantly based on bioclimatic definition used, with nearly half of all tropical dry forest vegetation missed when using ecoregion boundaries alone, especially in Africa. Using site-specific field validation, we find that the FAO definition using CHELSA provides an accurate, standard, and repeatable way to assess tropical dry forest cover and change at a global scale.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Altered cyclone–fire interactions are changing ecosystems

Archive ouverte | Ibanez, Thomas | CCSD

International audience. Global change is altering interactions between ecological disturbances. We review interactions between tropical cyclones and fires that affect woody biomes in many islands and coastal areas. ...

Regional forcing explains local species diversity and turnover on tropical islands

Archive ouverte | Ibanez, Thomas | CCSD

International audience. Aim: To determine the role of regional forcing on plot-level species diversity and composition, and to quantify the relative importance of biogeographical and climatic factors in explaining w...

Globally consistent impact of tropical cyclones on the structure of tropical and subtropical forests

Archive ouverte | Ibanez, Thomas | CCSD

International audience. 1.Tropical cyclones (TCs) are large-scale disturbances that regularly impact tropical forests. Although long-term impacts of TCs on forest structure have been proposed, a global test of the r...

Chargement des enrichissements...