Phenotypic discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer in the large-scale real-life multicenter French ESME cohort

Archive ouverte

Grinda, Thomas | Joyon, Natacha | Lusque, Amélie | Lefèvre, Sarah | Arnould, Laurent | Penault-Llorca, Frédérique | Macgrogan, Gaëtan | Treilleux, Isabelle | Vincent-Salomon, Anne | Haudebourg, Juliette | Maran-Gonzalez, Aurélie | Charafe-Jauffret, Emmanuelle | Courtinard, Coralie | Franchet, Camille | Verriele, Véronique | Brain, Etienne | Tas, Patrick | Blanc-Fournier, Cécile | Leroux, Agnès | Loussouarn, Delphine | Berghian, Anca | Brabencova, Eva | Ghnassia, Jean Pierre | Scoazec, Jean-Yves | Delaloge, Suzette | Filleron, Thomas | Lacroix-Triki, Magali

Edité par CCSD ; Nature -

International audience. Abstract Expression of hormone receptor (HR) for estrogens (ER) and progesterone (PR) and HER2 remains the cornerstone to define the therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients. We aimed to compare phenotypic profiles between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the ESME database, a National real-life multicenter cohort of MBC patients. Patients with results available on both primary tumour and metastatic disease within 6 months of MBC diagnosis and before any tumour progression were eligible for the main analysis. Among the 16,703 patients included in the database, 1677 (10.0%) had available biopsy results at MBC diagnosis and on matched primary tumour. The change rate of either HR or HER2 was 27.0%. Global HR status changed (from positive = either ER or PR positive, to negative = both negative; and reverse) in 14.2% of the cases (expression loss in 72.5% and gain in 27.5%). HER2 status changed in 7.8% (amplification loss in 45.2%). The discordance rate appeared similar across different biopsy sites. Metastasis to bone, HER2+ and RH+/HER2- subtypes and previous adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not relapse interval were associated with an HR discordance in multivariable analysis. Loss of HR status was significantly associated with a risk of death (HR adjusted = 1.51, p = 0.002) while gain of HR and HER2 discordance was not. In conclusion, discordance of HR and HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer cannot be neglected. In addition, HR loss is associated with worse survival. Sampling metastatic sites is essential for treatment adjustment.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Mise à jour 2021 des recommandations du GEFPICS pour l’évaluation du statut HER2 dans les cancers infiltrants du sein en France. [2021 update of the GEFPICS’ recommendations for HER2 status assessment in invasive breast cancer in France]

Archive ouverte | Franchet, Camille | CCSD

International audience. The last international guidelines on HER2 determination in breast cancer have been updated in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists, on the ba...

[GEFPICS' guidelines for management of breast cancer tissue samples in the neoadjuvant setting]. Recommandations du GEFPICS pour la prise en charge des prélèvements dans le cadre du traitement néoadjuvant du cancer du sein

Archive ouverte | Maran-Gonzalez, Aurélie | CCSD

International audience. Neoadjuvant therapy is an increasing treatment option in the management of breast cancer. The tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, especially the pathological complete response, is a valida...

Mise à jour 2014 des recommandations du GEFPICS pour l’évaluation du statut HER2 dans les cancers du sein en France

Archive ouverte | Penault-Llorca, Frédérique | CCSD

International audience. De nouvelles recommandations internationales pour l’évaluation du statut HER2 dans les cancers du sein, basées sur plus de dix ans d’expérience et sur les résultats d’études cliniques et de c...

Chargement des enrichissements...