Coronary Events After Dispensing of Ibuprofen: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Versus Paracetamol in the French Nationwide Claims Database Sample. : Drug Saf

Archive ouverte

Duong, M. | Abouelfath, A. | Lassalle, R. | Droz, C. | Blin, P. | Moore, Nicholas

Edité par CCSD ; Springer Verlag -

International audience. INTRODUCTION: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with a dose and duration-dependent coronary risk. There is little information concerning analgesic-dose ibuprofen, among the most widely used drugs worldwide. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to measure the risks of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after dispensing of ibuprofen, versus paracetamol. METHODS: Propensity score 1:2-matched cohorts of ibuprofen or paracetamol treatment episodes (TEs) in Echantillon Generaliste de Beneficiaires (EGB), the 1/97 sample of Systeme National des Donnees de Sante (SNDS), the French nationwide claims database, from 2009 to 2014, were compared. Outcomes were hospital admissions for ACS during the 3 months after the dispensing of ibuprofen or paracetamol. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated overall and stratified on low-dose aspirin dispensing. RESULTS: A total of 315,269 ibuprofen TEs in 168,400 persons were matched to 630,457 paracetamol TEs in 395,952 patients. Event rates were 50-100 times higher in low-dose aspirin users (27 vs 0.28 per 1000 patient years). Overall there was no difference in risk of ACS at 3 months (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.20) despite a transient increase in the first 2 weeks in ibuprofen users (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11-2.59). In the stratified analysis, this short-term risk was only found in aspirin users (5% of population, HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.24-3.24), but not in non-aspirin users (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.40-2.94). CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence for an increased risk of ACS in patients dispensed ibuprofen compared to paracetamol.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Comparative Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists: A High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched New Users Cohort Study in the French National Healthcare Data System SNDS. : Am J Cardiovasc Drugs

Archive ouverte | Blin, P. | CCSD

International audience. BackgroundClinical trials have indicated that the direct-acting oral anticoagulants dabigatran and rivaroxaban have better risk/benefit profiles than do vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for strok...

Pharmacoepidemiology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. : Therapie

Archive ouverte | Moore, Nicholas | CCSD

International audience. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are reversible inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase (COX), mainly used for the symptomatic relief of pain, whether traumatic, infectious, episodic or r...

Effectiveness and safety of 110 or 150 mg dabigatran vs. vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. : Br J Clin Pharmacol

Archive ouverte | Blin, P. | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND: We compared the 1-year safety and effectiveness of dabigatran 110 mg (D110) or 150 mg (D150) to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF...

Chargement des enrichissements...