Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors

Archive ouverte

Schroter, S. | Montagni, Ilaria | Loder, E. | Eikermann, M. | Schaffner, E. | Kurth, T.

Edité par CCSD ; BMJ Publishing Group -

International audience. Objectives: To investigate authors’ awareness and use of authorship guidelines, and to assess their perceptions of the fairness of authorship decisions.Design: A cross-sectional online survey.Setting and participants: Corresponding authors of research papers submitted in 2014 to 18 BMJ journals.Results 3859/12 646 (31%) researchers responded. They worked in 93 countries and varied in research experience. Of these, 1326 (34%) reported their institution had an authorship policy providing criteria for authorship; 2871 (74%) were ‘very familiar’ with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ authorship criteria and 3358 (87%) reported that guidelines were beneficial when preparing manuscripts. Furthermore, 2609 (68%) reported that their use was ‘sometimes’ or ‘frequently’ encouraged in their research setting. However, 2859 respondents (74%) reported that they had been involved in a study at least once where someone was added as an author who had not contributed substantially (honorary authorship), and 1305 (34%) where someone was not listed as an author but had contributed substantially (ghost authorship). Only 740 (19%) reported that they had never experienced either honorary or ghost authorship; 1115 (29%) reported that they had experienced both at least once. There was no clear pattern in experience of authorship misappropriation by continent. For their last coauthored article, 2187 (57%) reported that explicit authorship criteria had been used to determine eligibility, and 3088 (80%) felt that the decision made was fair. When institutions frequently encouraged use of authorship guidelines, authorship eligibility was more likely to be discussed early (817 of 1410, 58%) and perceived as fairer (1273 of 1410, 90%) compared with infrequent encouragement (974 of 2449, 40%, and 1891 of 2449, 74%).Conclusions: Despite a high level of awareness of authorship guidelines and criteria, these are not so widely used; more explicit encouragement of their use by institutions may result in more favourable use of guidelines by authors.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Regular Physical Activity Levels and Incidence of Restrictive Spirometry Pattern: A Longitudinal Analysis of 2 Population-Based Cohorts. : Am J Epidemiol

Archive ouverte | Carsin, A. E. | CCSD

International audience. A restrictive spirometry pattern is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Whether practicing regular physical activity protects against this pattern has never been studied. We estimat...

Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them

Archive ouverte | Garattini, S. | CCSD

International audience. Using the best quality of clinical research evidence is essential for choosing the right treatment for patients. How to identify the best research evidence is, however, difficult. In this nar...

Convergence of psychiatric symptoms and restless legs syndrome: A cross-sectional study in an elderly French population. : J Psychosom Res

Archive ouverte | Tully, Phillip J. | CCSD

International audience. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the association between restless legs syndrome (RLS) with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), major depression disorder (MDD), dysthymia, and GAD-depr...

Chargement des enrichissements...