The quantitative ultrasound method for assessing low bone mass in women with anorexia nervosa

Archive ouverte

Maïmoun, Laurent | Renard, Eric | Huguet, Héléna | Lefebvre, Patrick | Boudousq, Vincent | Mahadea, Krishna | Picot, Marie Christine | Doré, Rémi | Philibert, Pascal | Seneque, Maude | Gaspari, Laura | Courtet, Philippe | Sultan, Charles | Sultan, Ariane | Laux, Didier | Guillaume, Sébastien | Mariano-Goulart, Denis

Edité par CCSD ; Springer Verlag -

International audience. This study investigated the potential role of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) to assess low bone mass in anorexia nervosa patients (AN). Bone parameters from QUS and DXA were positively correlated and significantly reduced in AN compared with controls, suggesting that QUS is a pertinent technique to assess low bone mass in these patients.Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of an alternative technique, quantitative ultrasound (QUS), to assess low bone mass in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN).Methods: Two hundred seven young women (134 patients with AN and 73 healthy controls) with ages ranging from 14.4 to 38.4 years participated in this observational cross-sectional study. Bone mass was concomitantly evaluated by DXA to determine areal bone mineral density (aBMD; g/cm2) at hip, lumbar spine, and radius and by QUS to determine broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA; dB/MHz) at the heel.Results: BUA (66.5 ± 4.6 dB/MHz vs 61.0 ± 5.0 dB/MHz) and aBMD at the hip (0.916 ± 0.013 g/cm2 vs 0.806 ± 0.010 g/cm2), lumbar spine (0.966 ± 0.012 g/cm2 vs 0.886 ± 0.010 g/cm2), and radius (0.545 ± 0.005 g/cm2 vs 0.526 ± 0.04 g/cm2) were significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in patients with AN compared with controls. When patient and control data were pooled, BUA was significantly correlated with aBMD at the hip (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), lumbar spine (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), and radius (r = 0.40, p<0.001). In patients with AN, BUA and aBMD were mainly and positively correlated with weight, lean tissue mass, body mass index (BMI), and minimal BMI life and negatively with the duration of both disease and amenorrhea. Better concordance between the two techniques was obtained when absolute BUA and aBMD values were used according to the WHO T score classification.Conclusion: BUA measurement at the heel by QUS appears to be a pertinent nonionizing technique to assess low bone mass in patients with AN.

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Mémoire et thèse
• Gestion