Inter-comparison of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota

Archive ouverte

Vives I Batlle, J. | Balonov, M. | Beaugelin-Seiller, K. | Beresford, N.A. | Brown, J. | Cheng, J.-J. | Copplestone, D. | Doi, M. | Filistovic, V. | Golikov, V. | Horyna, J. | Hosseini, A. | Howard, B.J. | Jones, S.R. | Kamboj, S. | Kryshev, A. | Nedveckaite, T. | Olyslaegers, G. | Pröhl, G. | Sazykina, T. | Ulanovsky, A. | Vives Lynch, S. | Yankovich, T. | Yu, C.

Edité par CCSD ; Springer Verlag -

International audience. A number of approaches have been proposed to estimate the exposure of non-human biota to ionizing radiation. This paper reports an inter-comparison of the unweighted absorbed dose rates for the whole organism (compared as dose conversion coefficients, or DCCs) for both internal and external exposure, estimated by 11 of these approaches for selected organisms from the Reference Animals and Plants geometries as proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Inter-comparison results indicate that DCCs for internal exposure compare well between the different approaches, whereas variation is greater for external exposure DCCs. Where variation among internal DCCs is greatest, it is generally due to different daughter products being included in the DCC of the parent. In the case of external exposures, particularly to low-energy β-emitters, variations are most likely to be due to different media densities being assumed. On a radionuclide-by-radionuclide basis, the different approaches tend to compare least favourably for 3H, 14C and the α-emitters. This is consistent with models with different source/target geometry assumptions showing maximum variability in output for the types of radiation having the lowest range across matter. The intercomparison demonstrated that all participating approaches to biota dose calculation are reasonably comparable, despite a range of different assumptions being made. © 2007 Springer-Verlag.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

The estimation of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota: An extended intercomparison

Archive ouverte | Vives I Batlle, J. | CCSD

International audience. An exercise to compare 10 approaches for the calculation of unweighted whole-body absorbed dose rates was conducted for 74 radionuclides and five of the ICRP's Reference Animals and Plants, o...

An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota

Archive ouverte | Beresford, N.A. | CCSD

International audience. Over the last decade a number of models and approaches have been developed for the estimation of the exposure of non-human biota to ionising radiations. In some countries these are now being ...

ALLIANCE perspectives on integration of humans and the environment into the system of radiological protection

Archive ouverte | Vandenhove, H. | CCSD

International audience. Risks posed by the presence of radionuclides in the environment require an efficient, balanced, and adaptable assessment for protecting exposed humans and wildlife, and managing the associate...

Chargement des enrichissements...