Prioritising outcomes for evaluating eosinophil-guided corticosteroid therapy among patients with acute COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalisation: a Delphi consensus study

Archive ouverte

Suehs, Carey Meredith | Zysman, Maéva | Chenivesse, Cecile | Burgel, Pierre-Régis | Couturaud, F. | Deslée, Gaetan | Berger, Patrick | Raherison, Chantal | Devouassoux, Gilles | Brousse, Christophe | Roche, Nicolas | Molimard, Mathieu | Chinet, Thierry | Devillier, Philippe | Chanez, Pascal | Kessler, Romain | Didier, Alain | Martinat, Yan | Le Rouzic, Olivier | Bourdin, Arnaud

Edité par CCSD ; BMJ Publishing Group -

International audience. Objectives Presently, those outcomes that should be prioritised for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation studies remain unclear. In order to coordinate multicentre studies on eosinophilia-driven corticosteroid therapy for patients hospitalised for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), we aimed to find consensus among experts in the domain regarding the prioritisation of outcomes.Design A modified Delphi study was proposed to recognised COPD experts. Two brainstorming questionnaires were used to collect potential outcomes. Four subsequent rounds of questionnaires were used to rank items according to a six-point Likert scale for their importance in the protocol, as well as for being the primary outcome. Priority outcome criteria were predefined as those for which ≥70% of experts indicated that the outcome was essential for interpreting study results.Setting COPD exacerbation management in France.Participants 34 experts recommended by the French Language Pulmonology Society were invited to participate. Of the latter, 21 experts participated in brainstorming, and 19 participated in all four ranking rounds.Results 105 outcomes were ranked. Two achieved consensus as candidate primary outcomes: (1) treatment failure defined as death from any cause or the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation, readmission because of COPD or intensification of pharmacologic therapy, and (2) the time required to meet predefined discharge criteria. The 10 secondary priority outcomes included survival, time with no sign of improvement, episodes of hospitalisation, exacerbation, pneumonia, mechanical or non-invasive ventilation and oxygen use, as well as comorbidities during the initial hospitalisation.Conclusions This Delphi consensus project generated and prioritised a great many outcomes, documenting current expert views concerning a diversity of COPD endpoints. Among the latter, 12 reached consensus as priority outcomes for evaluating the efficacy of eosinophil-driven corticosteroid therapy in AECOPD inpatients.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Change in cardiorespiratory parameters following surgical correction of pectus excavatum: protocol for the historical-prospective HeartSoar cohort

Archive ouverte | Suehs, Carey Meredith | CCSD

International audience. Introduction How cardiorespiratory function changes following the surgical correction of pectus excavatum (PE) often gives mixed results, with meta-analyses demonstrating no benefit in terms ...

Randomised controlled trials in severe asthma: selection by phenotype or stereotype

Archive ouverte | Pahus, Laurie | CCSD

International audience

Standard patient training versus Vik-Asthme chatbot-guided training: ‘AsthmaTrain’ – a protocol for a randomised controlled trial for patients with asthma

Archive ouverte | Suehs, Carey Meredith | CCSD

International audience. Introduction : Therapeutic education for patients with asthma has been shown to reduce asthma morbidity. The high availability of smart phones provides the opportunity to furnish patient trai...

Chargement des enrichissements...