Welfare indicators. Report of the ENCAW – Working group for Area 1

Archive ouverte

Veissier, Isabelle | Dalmau, Antoni | Knierim, Ute | Mounier, Luc | Velarde, Antonio | Winckler, Christoph

Edité par CCSD -

On-farm animal welfare assessment may be predominantly based on resource based measures such as the type of housing, feeding, health plan (e.g. in the Animal Needs Index ) or on animal based measures such as body condition, behaviour or health measures (e.g. in Welfare Quality®). The choice between the two types of measures seems dogmatic, some authors considering that resource based measures detect risk factors for animal welfare whereas animal based measures better reflect the true welfare state of animals. In order to review available resource vs. animal based measures, we first drew a list of properties for a measure to be considered valid for assessing animal welfare. These properties have been derived from analytical methods: selectivity, trueness, reliability (repeatability, reproducibility), stability over time, fitness for the purpose (including sensitivity), and feasibility in different systems. The properties of the measures for the 12 welfare criteria defined in Welfare Quality® were analysed. For some criteria, animal based measures are more suitable than resource based measures, this is the case for absence of prolonged hunger, absence of injuries or diseases or good human-animal-relationship for which different factors interact so that resource based measures have a low predictive value. In other cases, resource based measures are more suitable because animal based measures are not sensitive enough (for absence of thirst) or not feasible (detection of pain during some management procedures on farm). Finally, for some criteria a combination of resource and animal based measures is necessary. This is the case for comfort around resting where problems (negative aspects) can be detected on animals while positive aspects – the actual comfort – may be assessed through resource based measures. In conclusion, there is no general rule whether animal based measures are more or less valid than resource based ones. This depends on the welfare criterion considered and to a lesser extent on the animal type. We recommend to use a mixture of animal and resource based measures (chosen according to their validity and feasibility) to assess the overall welfare of animals on farms.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Dehorning of cattle in the EU Member States: A quantitative survey of the current practices.

Archive ouverte | Cozzi, Giulio | CCSD

International audience. A survey was carried out to describe the extent and current practice of cattle disbudding/dehorning in the EU Member States. Disbudding was defined as removal of horns in calves of up to 2 mo...

Integration of data collected on farms or at slaughter to generate an overall of animal welfare

Archive ouverte | Botreau, Raphaëlle | CCSD

International audience

Development of welfare measures and protocols for the collection of data on farms or at slaughter

Archive ouverte | Veissier, Isabelle | CCSD

International audience. One of the main objectives of the Welfare Quality® project was to develop a standardised system for assessing the welfare of animals kept on farms or at slaughter and thus accommodate the mai...

Chargement des enrichissements...