Growth effects of exclusive breastfeeding promotion by peer counsellors in sub-Saharan Africa: the cluster-randomised PROMISE EBF trial

Archive ouverte

Engebretsen, Ingunn Marie Stadskleiv | Jackson, Debra | Fadnes, Lars Thore | Nankabirwa, Victoria | Diallo, Abdoulaye Hama | Doherty, Tanya | Lombard, Carl | Swanvelder, Sonja | Nankunda, Jolly | Ramokolo, Vundli | Sanders, David | Wamani, Henry | Meda, Nicolas | Tumwine, James | Ekström, Eva-Charlotte | van de Perre, Philippe | Kankasa, Chipepo | Sommerfelt, Halvor | Tylleskär, Thorkild

Edité par CCSD ; BioMed Central -

International audience. Background : In this multi-country cluster-randomized behavioural intervention trial promoting exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in Africa, we compared growth of infants up to 6 months of age living in communities where peer counsellors promoted EBF with growth in those infants living in control communities.Methods : A total of 82 clusters in Burkina Faso, Uganda and South Africa were randomised to either theintervention or the control arm. Feeding data and anthropometric measurements were collected at visits scheduled3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks post-partum. We calculated weight-for-length (WLZ), length-for-age (LAZ) and weight-for-age(WAZ) z-scores. Country specific adjusted Least Squares Means with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on alongitudinal analysis are reported. Prevalence ratios (PR) for the association between peer counselling for EBF andwasting (WLZ <−2), stunting (LAZ <−2) and underweight (WAZ <−2) were calculated at each data collection point.Results : The study included a total of 2,579 children. Adjusting for socio-economic status, the mean WLZ at24 weeks were in Burkina Faso−0.20 (95% CI−0.39 to−0.01) and in Uganda−0.23 (95% CI−0.43 to−0.03) lower inthe intervention than in the control arm. In South Africa the mean WLZ at 24 weeks was 0.23 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.43)greater in the intervention than in the control arm. Differences in LAZ between the study arms were small and notstatistically significant. In Uganda, infants in the intervention arm were more likely to be wasted compared to thosein the control arm at 24 weeks (PR 2.36; 95% CI 1.11 to 5.00). Differences in wasting in South Africa and Burkina Fasoand stunting and underweight in all three countries were small and not significantly different.Conclusions : There were small differences in mean anthropometric indicators between the intervention andcontrol arms in the study, but in Uganda and Burkina Faso, a tendency to slightly lower ponderal growth(weight-for-length z-scores) was found in the intervention arms

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Mémoire et thèse
• Gestion