Standardized Method to Measure Muscle Force at the Bedside in Hemodialysis Patients

Archive ouverte

Souweine, Jean-Sébastien | Boudet, Agathe | Chenine, Leila | Leray, Helene | Rodriguez, Annie | Mourad, Georges | Mercier, Jacques | Cristol, Jean-Paul | Hayot, Maurice | Gouzi, Fares

Edité par CCSD ; WB Saunders -

International audience. Objectives: In hemodialysis, diminution of muscle strength constitutes a major prognostic factor of mortality. Currently, measurement of quadriceps isometric maximal voluntary force (MVF) represents the reference method to investigate muscle strength. However, reduction of MVF is rarely detected in these patients due to the absence of portative bedside tools in clinical practice. The purposes of this study were therefore to assess the agreement of a belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer (HHD) with the dynamometer chair (reference method) and to determine intratester and intertester reliability of the quadriceps MVF measurements using belt-stabilized HHD in healthy subjects and in hemodialysis patients.Design: Repeated-measures cross-sectional study.Setting: Clinical and academic hospital.Participants: Fifty-three healthy adult subjects (23 males, 36.5 + 12.5 y.o.) and 21 hemodialysis patients (14 males, 72.4 + 13.3 y.o., dialysis vintage 30 + 75.1 months).Intervention: Not applicable.Main outcome measure: MVF measurements were assessed with belt-stabilized HHD and dynamometer chair, by two independent investigators. The agreement between the two devices would be quantified using the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (LOA) method and the Spearman correlation.Results: For healthy subjects and hemodialysis patients, Spearman coefficients between belt-stabilized HHD and dynamometer chair were 0.63 and 0.75, respectively (P < .05). In hemodialysis group, reliability was excellent for both the intratester and intertester reliability R2 = 0.85 (P < .01) and R2 = 0.90 (P < .01), respectively. In all individuals, the mean difference between the dynamometer chair and the belt-stabilized HHD was -13.07 ± 21.77 N.m. (P < .001). The LOA for the upper and the lower was 29.59 and -55.73 N.m., respectively.Conclusion: In healthy subjects and in hemodialysis patients, the belt-stabilized HHD dynamometer appears as a valid and reliable method to measure in clinical practice isometric MVF of quadriceps in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, the belt-stabilized HHD appears as a suitable and a relevant diagnostic tool for the identification of muscle dysfunction in hemodialysis patients.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Physical inactivity and protein energy wasting play independent roles in muscle weakness in maintenance haemodialysis patients

Archive ouverte | Souweine, Jean-Sébastien | CCSD

International audience. Background: Muscle weakness is associated with increased mortality risk in chronic haemodialysis (CHD) patients. Protein energy wasting (PEW) and low physical activity could impair muscle qua...

Beyond sarcopenia: frailty in chronic haemodialysis patients

Archive ouverte | Souweine, Jean-Sébastien | CCSD

International audience. Background: Frailty, characterized by vulnerability, reduced reserves, and increased susceptibility to severe events, is a significant concern in chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients. Sarcopen...

Dynapenia and sarcopenia in chronic haemodialysis patients: do muscle weakness and atrophy similarly influence poor outcome?

Archive ouverte | Souweine, Jean-Sébastien | CCSD

International audience. Background and aims : Sarcopenia, defined as a decline in both muscle mass and function, has been recognized as a major determinant of poor outcome in hemodialysis patients. It is generally a...

Chargement des enrichissements...