DATA Aggregation effects in regional yield simulations

Archive ouverte

Hoffmann, Holger | Kersebaum, Kurt Christian | Zhao, Gang | Asseng, Senthold | Bindi, Marco | Cammarano, Davide | Constantin, Julie | Coucheney, Elsa | Dechow, Rene | Doro, Luca | Eckersten, Henrik | Gaiser, Thomas | Grosz, Balazs | Haas, Edwin | Kassie, Belay T. | Kiese, Ralf | Klatt, Steffen | Kuhnert, Matthias | Lewan, Elisabet | Moriondo, Marco | Nendel, Claas | Raynal, Helene | Roggero, Pier Paolo | Rötter, Reimund Paul | Siebert, Stefan J. | Sosa, Carmen | Specka, Xenia | Tao, Fulu | Teixeira, Edmar | Trombi, Giacomo | Yeluripati, Jagadeesh | Vanuytrecht, Eline | Wallach, Daniel | Wang, Enli | Weihermueller, Lutz | Zhao, Zhigan | Ewert, Frank

Edité par CCSD -

Session: AgMIP: Advances in Crop & Soil Model Intercomparison and Improvement Oral
Session: AgMIP: Advances in Crop & Soil Model Intercomparison and Improvement Oral. Regional yield simulations with process-based models often rely on input data of coarse spatial resolution (Ewert et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2015). Using aggregated data as input for process-based models entails the risks of introducing so-called aggregation errors (AE). Such AE depend on the model structure in combination with the aggregation method, the type of aggregated data as well as its spatial heterogeneity. While the regional crop yield bias is usually <5 % on average over all years, it may increase in single years (Hoffmann et al. 2015), depending on the model. Here we present a model intercomparison on AE for a range of environmental conditions with varying combinations of aggregated climate, soil and crop management data for two crops grown under varying production situations. Multi-model ensemble runs were conducted with soil, climate and crop management input data at resolutions from 1 to 100 km for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Climate data was spatially averaged. Soil data was aggregated by area majority. Aggregated crop management data was obtained by applying management rules on aggregated climate data. Winter wheat and silage maize yields of 1982-2011 were simulated with 11 models for potential, water-limited and water-nitrogen-limited production after calibration to average regional sowing date, harvest date and crop yield. Regional yields were reproduced by the models on average, regardless of input data type and resolution. However, large AE were observed in dry years as well as due to soil aggregation. AE due to aggregated management data were comparatively lower. Finally, models differed considerably in AE. The results highlight the interactions between model, data and aggregation method with AE, emphasizing the importance of models intercomparison analyses.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Impact of climate aggregation over different scales on regional NPP modelling

Archive ouverte | Kuhnert, Matthias | CCSD

In spatial modelling of Net Primary Productivity (NPP), predictability and uncertainty depends on the availability of input data, as well as on the scale of the available data sets. Therefore, the study presented here quantifies t...

Uncertainties in scaling-up crop models for large-area climate change impact assessments

Archive ouverte | Ewert, Frank | CCSD

Uncertainties in scaling-up crop models for large-area climate change impact assessments

The implication of input data aggregation on up-scaling soil organic carbon changes

Archive ouverte | Grosz, Balázs | CCSD

In up-scaling studies, model input data aggregation is a common method to cope with deficient data availability and limit the computational effort. We analyzed model errors due to soil data aggregation for modeled SOC trends. For ...

Chargement des enrichissements...