Comparison of purebred and crossbred embryos through time lapse

Archive ouverte

de Paula Reis, Alline | Le Guienne, Brigitte | Joullie, Laetitia | Grimard, Bénédicte

Edité par CCSD -

Crossbred embryos have been reported to present higher and faster rates of development in vitro than purebred ones. The objective of the present study was to compare the development of purebred and crossbred embryos through the time lapse of their development. Material and methods: The embryos were produced in vitro from bovine slaughterhouse oocytes and frozen thawed semen. Purebred Embryos (PE) were produced from Holstein (H) and Montbeliard (M) oocytes inseminated with Holstein (H) or Montbeliard (M) semen (PE = HH and MM embryos). Crossbred Embryos (CE) were produced from Holstein (H) and Montbeliard (M) oocytes inseminated with Montbeliard (M) or Holstein (H) semen (CE = HM and MH embryos). Semen of 3 bulls of each breed were used. We performed four sessions of 32 embryos (8HH, 8MM, 8HM, 8MH) incubated individually in microwells placed under a microcamera (PrimovisionTM). Pictures were taken every 15 minutes until 192 h of development. The media and atmospheric conditions were previously described (Grimard et al., 2013). Development rates and the timing of reaching the 2, 4, 8 cells, morula and blastocyst stages were registered. Development rates of CE and PE groups were compared using the X2 test. Fixed effects of oocyte and semen breed and crossbreeding on embryo kinetic parameters were tested by multivariate analysis taking into account the random effect of IVF session. Results and conclusion: 128 embryos were produced. The 2 cells development rate was significantly lower in the CE than in the PE group. No differences were observed for 4, 8 cells, morula and blastocyst rates (78,1 vs 92,2% ; 67,2 vs 75% ; 53,1 vs 46,9% ; 45,3 vs 40,6% ; 31,3 vs 35,9%, CE vs PE, respectively, p>0,05). The timing of development was similar in both groups (p>0,05). On average, CE and PE groups reached 2, 4, 8 cells, morula and blastocyst stages at 31,8h +5,9 and 31,6h +6,0; 42,9h +6,7 and 43,2h +7,8; 63,9h +19,9 and 59,9h +18,6; 109,3h +10,4 and 108,4 +11,3;152,3h +17,7 and 150,6h +15,1; respectively. Under our conditions, crossbreeding had a negative effect on the development rate observed at the 2 cells stage but no significant effeossbreeding did not affect the timing of development observed during the time lapses.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Complex Biologic Conception : Planning and business models. The case of equine cloning. Conception biologique complexe : Planification et modèles d'affaires. Le cas du clonage équin.

Archive ouverte | de Paula Reis, Alline | CCSD

Life sciences noticed important technological developments during the last decades. Some promising examples, developed in the 90's and 2000's, were mammals cloning, animal and vegetal transgenesis and the therapeutic stem cells. T...

Biotechnologies in the Horse Industry through the Lenses of Design

Archive ouverte | de Paula Reis, Alline | CCSD

4e conférence « Des outils pour décider ensemble » (OPDE). International audience

Conception et planification dans les biotechnologies innovantes : le clonage équin

Archive ouverte | Nakhla, Michel | CCSD

National audience

Chargement des enrichissements...