Impacts of data quality on the setting of conservation planning targets using the species-area relationship

Archive ouverte

Metcalfe, Kristian | Delavenne, Juliette | Garcia, Clément | Foveau, Aurélie | Dauvin, Jean-Claude | Coggan, Roger | Vaz, Sandrine | Harrop, Stuart R. | Smith, Robert J.

Edité par CCSD ; Wiley -

International audience. AimThe species–area relationship (SAR) is increasingly being used to set conservation targets for habitat types when designing protected area networks. This approach is transparent and scientifically defensible, but there has been little research on how it is affected by data quality and quantity.LocationEnglish Channel.MethodsWe used a macrobenthic dataset containing 1314 sampling points and assigned each point to its associated habitat type. We then used the SAR-based approach and tested whether this was influenced by changes in (i) the number of sampling points used to generate estimates of total species richness for each habitat type; (ii) the nonparametric estimator used to calculate species richness; and (iii) the level of habitat classification employed. We then compared our results with targets from a similar national-level study that is currently being used to identify Marine Conservation Zones in the UK.ResultsWe found that targets were affected by all of the tested factors. Sample size had the greatest impact, with specific habitat targets increasing by up to 45% when sample size increased from 50 to 300. We also found that results based on the Bootstrap estimator of species richness, which is the most widely used for setting targets, were more influenced by sample size than the other tested estimators. Finally, we found that targets were higher when using broader habitat classification levels or a larger study region. However, this could also be a sample size effect because these larger habitat areas generally contained more sampling points.Main conclusionsHabitat targets based on the SAR can be strongly influenced by sample size, choice of richness estimator and the level of habitat classification. Whilst setting habitat targets using best-available data should play a key role in conservation planning, further research is needed to develop methods that better account for sampling effort.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Systematic conservation planning in the eastern English Channel: comparing the Marxan and Zonation decision-support tools

Archive ouverte | Delavenne, Juliette | CCSD

The systematic conservation approach is now commonly used for the design of efficient marine protected area (MPA) networks. Identifying these priority areas often involves using specific conservation-planning software. Several of ...

Process-driven and biological characterisation and mapping of seabed habitats sensitive to trawling

Archive ouverte | Foveau, Aurélie | CCSD

International audience. The increase of anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment together with the necessity of a sustainable management of marine living resources have underlined the need to map and model ...

Evaluating conservation and fisheries management strategies by linking spatial prioritization software and ecosystem and fisheries modelling tools

Archive ouverte | Metcalfe, Kristian | CCSD

International audience. Well-designed marine protected area (MPA) networks can deliver a range of ecological, economic and social benefits, and so a great deal of research has focused on developing spatial conservat...

Chargement des enrichissements...