What is the clinical benefit of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5FU/leucovorin for T3-4 rectal cancer in a pooled analysis of EORTC 22921 and FFCD 9203 trials: Surrogacy in question?

Archive ouverte

Bonnetain, Franck | Bosset, J. F. | Gerard, J. P. | Calais, G. | Conroy, T. | Mineur, L. | Bouché, O. | Maingon, P. | Chapet, O. | Radosevic-Jelic, L. | Methy, N. | Collette, L.

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier -

International audience. BACKGROUND: Two phase III trials of neoadjuvant treatment in T3-4 rectal cancer established that adding chemotherapy (CRT) to radiotherapy (RT) improves pathological complete response (pCR) and local control (LC). We combined trials to assess the clinical benefit of CRT on overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and to explore the surrogacy of pCR and LC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22921 (1011 patients) and FFCD 9203 (756 patients) were pooled. Meta-analysis methodology was used to compare neoadjuvant CRT to RT for OS, PFS LC and distant progression (DP). Weighted linear regression was used to estimate trial-level association (surrogacy R(2)) between treatment effects on candidate surrogate (pCR, LC, DP) and OS. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5.6years. Compared to RT (881pts), CRT (886pts) did not prolong OS, DP or PFS. The 5-y OS-rate was 66.3% with CRT versus 65.9% in RT (hazard ratios (HR)=1.04 {0.88-1.21}). CRT significantly improved LC (HR=0.54, 95%confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.72). PFS was validated as surrogate for OS with R(2)=0.88. Neoadjuvant treatment effects on LC (R(2)=0.17) or DP (R(2)=0.31) did not predict effects on OS. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRT does not prolong OS or PFS. pCR or LC do not qualify as surrogate for PFS or OS while PFS is surrogate. Phase III trials should use OS or PFS as primary endpoint.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Mitomycin C with continuous fluorouracil or with cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy for locally advanced anal cancer (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II study 22011-40014).

Archive ouverte | Matzinger, O. | CCSD

International audience. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and activity of radio-chemotherapy with mitomycin C (MMC) and cisplatin (CDDP) in locally advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma with reference to radiothera...

Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study.

Archive ouverte | Chauffert, B. | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND: The role of chemoradiation with systemic chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred...

[Locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone: Definitive results of the 2000-2001 FFCD/SFRO phase III trial].

Archive ouverte | Barhoumi, M. | CCSD

International audience. PURPOSE: To compare chemoradiation with systemic chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with locally...

Chargement des enrichissements...