Application of evidence-based methods to construct mechanism-driven chemical assessment frameworks

Archive ouverte

Hoffmann, Sebastian | Aiassa, Elisa | Angrish, Michelle | Beausoleil, Claire | Bois, Frederic | Ciccolallo, Laura | Craig, Peter | de Vries, Rob | Dorne, Jean Lou C M | Druwe, Ingrid | Edwards, Stephen | Eskes, Chantra | Georgiadis, Marios | Hartung, Thomas | Kienzler, Aude | Kristjansson, Elisabeth | Lam, Juleen | Martino, Laura | Meek, Bette | Morgan, Rebecca | Munoz-Guajardo, Irene | Noyes, Pamela | Parmelli, Elena | Piersma, Aldert | Rooney, Andrew | Sena, Emily | Sullivan, Kristie | Tarazona, José | Terron, Andrea | Thayer, Kris | Turner, Jan | Verbeek, Jos | Verloo, Didier | Vinken, Mathieu | Watford, Sean | Whaley, Paul | Wikoff, Daniele | Willett, Kate | Tsaioun, Katya

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier -

International audience. The workshop titled "Application of evidence-based methods to construct mechanism-driven chemical assessment frameworks" was co-organized by the Evidence-based Toxicology Collaboration and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and hosted by EFSA at its headquarters in Parma, Italy on October 2 and 3, 2019. The goal was to explore integration of systematic review methods with mechanistic evidence evaluation. Participants were invited to work on concrete products to advance the exploration of how evidence-based approaches can support the development and application of adverse outcome pathways (AOP) in chemical risk assessment. The workshop discussions were centered around three related themes: 1) assessing certainty in AOPs, 2) literature-based AOP development and 3) integrating certainty in AOPs and non-animal evidence into decision frameworks. Several challenges, mostly related to methodology, were identified, and largely determined the workshop recommendations. The workshop recommendations included the comparison and potential alignment of processes used to develop AOP and systematic review methodology, including the translation of vocabulary of evidence-based methods to AOP and vice versa, the development and improvement of evidence mapping and text mining methods and tools, as well as a call for a fundamental change in chemical risk and uncertainty assessment methodology if to be conducted based on AOPs and new approach methodologies (NAM). The usefulness of evidence-based approaches for mechanism-based chemical risk assessments was stressed, particularly the potential contribution of the rigor and transparency inherent to such approaches in building stakeholders' trust for implementation of NAM evidence and AOP into chemical risk assessment.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Development of adverse outcome pathways relevant for the identification of substances having endocrine disruption properties Uterine adenocarcinoma as adverse outcome

Archive ouverte | Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio | CCSD

International audience. Development of adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) for uterine adenocarcinoma can provide a practical tool to implement the EFSA-ECHA Guidance (2018) for the identification of endocrine disruptor...

Integrated Testing Strategies (ITS) for safety assessment.

Archive ouverte | Rovida, Costanza | CCSD

International audience. Integrated testing strategies (ITS), as opposed to single definitive tests or fixed batteries of tests, are expected to efficiently combine different information sources in a quantifiable fas...

Draft for internal testing Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments

Archive ouverte | More, Simon | CCSD

International audience. EFSA requested its Scientific Committee to prepare a guidance document on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments. The guidan...

Chargement des enrichissements...