Perceptions of care following initiation of do-not-resuscitate orders

Article indépendant

DRIGGERS, Kathryn E. | DISHMAN, Sydney E. | CHUNG, Kevin K. | OLSEN, Cara H. | RYAN, Andrea B. | MCLAWHORN, Melissa M. | JOHNSON, Laura S.

PURPOSE: Documenting do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) can be controversial; some providers believe that DNR orders change care. This survey evaluates current perceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approved survey consisting of 31 validated questions divided into 3 factors (1. palliation, 2. active treatment, and 3. trust/communication). Individual questions were compared using Fisher's exact-tests and factors were compared via t-tests. RESULTS: Both surgical and ICU staff believe care decreases after DNR order initiation (43%). More surgical staff report decreased care aggressiveness versus ICU staff (63% vs 25%, p < 0.005 and Factor 2, 25.8 versus 29.8, p < 0.001), and felt that electrical cardioversion outside of the setting of ACLS would not be performed (57% vs 24%, p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical staff expressed more concern about care after DNR status than their ICU counterparts. Determining whether care actually changes clinically warrants further investigation.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154008

Voir la revue «Journal of critical care, 69»

Autres numéros de la revue «Journal of critical care»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion