A case for preference-sensitive decision timelines to aid shared decision-making in intensive care : Need and possible application

Article indépendant

GOCKING, Beatrix | GLOECKLER, Sophie | FERRARIO, Andrea | BRANDI, Giovanna | GLASSEL, Andrea | BILLER-ANDORNO, Nikola

In the intensive care unit, it can be challenging to determine which interventions align with the patients' preferences since patients are often incapacitated and other sources, such as advance directives and surrogate input, are integral. Managing treatment decisions in this context requires a process of shared decision-making and a keen awareness of the preference-sensitive instances over the course of treatment. The present paper examines the need for the development of preference-sensitive decision timelines, and, taking aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as a use case, proposes a model of one such timeline to illustrate their potential form and value. First, the paper draws on an overview of relevant literature to demonstrate the need for better guidance to (a) aid clinicians in determining when to elicit patient preference, (b) support the drafting of advance directives, and (c) prepare surrogates for their role representing the will of an incapacitated patient in clinical decision-making. This first section emphasizes that highlighting when patient (or surrogate) input is necessary can contribute valuably to shared decision-making, especially in the context of intensive care, and can support advance care planning. As an illustration, the paper offers a model preference-sensitive decision timeline-whose generation was informed by existing guidelines and a series of interviews with patients, surrogates, and neuro-intensive care clinicians-for a use case of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. In the last section, the paper offers reflections on how such timelines could be integrated into digital tools to aid shared decision-making.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1274717

Voir la revue «Frontiers in digital health, 5»

Autres numéros de la revue «Frontiers in digital health»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Advance care planning evaluation : a scoping ...

Article indépendant | GLOECKLER, Sophie | BMJ supportive & palliative care

Various indicators have been used to evaluate advance care planning, including completion rates, type of care received, and satisfaction. Recent consensus suggests, though, that receiving care consistent with one's goals is the pr...

Limitation of life sustaining measures in neu...

Article indépendant | BOGLI, Stefan Yu | Journal of intensive care | n°1 | vol.12

Background: The limitation of life sustaining treatments (LLST) causes ethical dilemmas even in patients faced with poor prognosis, which applies to many patients admitted to a Neurocritical Care Unit (NCCU). The effects of social...

Nurses' views on palliative care for those di...

Article | GLOECKLER, Sophie | Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing

Introduction: In recent years, palliative care approaches for patients diagnosed with severe, persistent mental illness have been proposed, but remain controversial. Aim/Question: The central research question of the present study...

De la même série

Artificially intelligent nursing homes : a sc...

Article indépendant | RONAN, Isabel | Frontiers in digital health | vol.7

INTRODUCTION: The world's population is aging at a rapid rate. Nursing homes are needed to care for an increasing number of older adults. Palliative care can improve the quality of life of nursing home residents. Artificial Intell...

A case for preference-sensitive decision time...

Article indépendant | GOCKING, Beatrix | Frontiers in digital health | vol.5

In the intensive care unit, it can be challenging to determine which interventions align with the patients' preferences since patients are often incapacitated and other sources, such as advance directives and surrogate input, are ...

Considerations in the reliability and fairnes...

Article indépendant | LU, Jonathan | Frontiers in digital health | vol.4

Multiple reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence (AI) models in healthcare recommend that models be audited for reliability and fairness. However, there is a gap of operational guidance for performing reliability and fair...

Fostering palliative care through digital int...

Article indépendant | KOUMAKIS, Lefteris | Frontiers in digital health | vol.3

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an emerging paradigm in clinical research and healthcare, aiming to capture the patient's self-assessed health status in order to gauge efficacy of treatment from their perspective. As these pa...

Chargement des enrichissements...