Inconsistency in brain death determination should not be tolerated

Article

BARNES, Erin | GREER, David

Since it was proposed in 1980, the Uniform Determination of Death Act has provided the legal basis for determination of death by neurological criteria. The act contains language that allows for acceptable medical standards to be used to determine death. Since 1995, the American Academy of Neurology has provided guidelines for brain death determination (revised in 2010), but nationwide adherence to these guidelines has been incomplete. This variability could lead to misdiagnosis and erosion of public trust in this important medical practice. Physicians must work together as a profession to push for uniformity and accuracy in death diagnosis.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2020.1027.

Voir la revue «AMA journal of ethics, 22»

Autres numéros de la revue «AMA journal of ethics»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Inconsistency in brain death determination sh...

Article indépendant | BARNES, Erin | AMA journal of ethics | n°12 | vol.22

Since it was proposed in 1980, the Uniform Determination of Death Act has provided the legal basis for determination of death by neurological criteria. The act contains language that allows for acceptable medical standards to be u...

Inconsistency in brain death determination sh...

Article indépendant | BARNES, Erin | AMA journal of ethics | n°12 | vol.22

Since it was proposed in 1980, the Uniform Determination of Death Act has provided the legal basis for determination of death by neurological criteria. The act contains language that allows for acceptable medical standards to be u...

An overview of national hospice study finding...

Article indépendant | GREER, David | Journal of chronic disease | n°1 | vol.39

De la même série

How should focus be shifted from individual p...

Article | CIMIOTTI, Jeannie P. | AMA journal of ethics | n°6 | vol.26

Despite growth in numbers of organizational antimicrobial stewardship programs, antimicrobial resistance continues to escalate. Interprofessional education and collaboration are needed to make these programs appropriately responsi...

Applying a health equity lens to better under...

Article | NIKZAD, Newsha | AMA journal of ethics | n°10 | vol.26

Racial and ethnic inequity exists throughout the lifespan, including at the end of life (EOL). Although prognostication is inherently fraught with uncertainty, many underrepresented minorities get prognoses that are overly optimis...

What should we do about the mismatch between ...

Article | ROBBINS, Nathaniel M. | AMA journal of ethics | n°12 | vol.22

Mismatch between whole-brain death criteria embedded in statutes and accepted tests physicians use to diagnose brain death have clinical and ethical implications that could undermine public trust in death pronouncements. We consid...

What does the public need to know about brain...

Article | BUSL, Katharina M. | AMA journal of ethics | n°12 | vol.22

Brain death differs from traditional circulatory death, and understanding how it differs is important. Public awareness of brain death is based largely on inaccurate media representations, common examples of which are described he...

Inconsistency in brain death determination sh...

Article | BARNES, Erin | AMA journal of ethics | n°12 | vol.22

Since it was proposed in 1980, the Uniform Determination of Death Act has provided the legal basis for determination of death by neurological criteria. The act contains language that allows for acceptable medical standards to be u...

Chargement des enrichissements...