Decisional control preferences of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care

Article indépendant

TRICOU, Colombe | YENNU, Sriram | RUER, Murielle | BRUERA, Eduardo | FILBET, Marilène

OBJECTIVE: Understanding patients' decisional control preferences (DCPs) is important to improving the quality of care and the satisfaction of patients who have advanced cancer with their care. In addition to passive decisional control (i.e., the patient prefers his/her doctor or family caregiver to make a decision on their behalf) and active decisional control (i.e., the patient decides alone), shared decisional control, where patients and caregivers decide together, could be more appropriate. The primary aim of our study was to describe the decision-making process and the DCPs of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care in France. METHOD: We conducted a prospective survey with advanced cancer patients referred to a palliative care team in an outpatient setting. We collected information about patients' demographic and clinical characteristics using the Decision Control Preference Scale, the Satisfaction with the Decisions and Care questionnaire, and the Understanding of Illness questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were evaluable. The median age was 63.5 years and 53.5% female. The cancers most commonly represented were gastrointestinal and breast. A total of 72 patients (36.2%) preferred active decisional control, 52 (26.1%) preferred shared decisional control, and 75 (37.7%) preferred passive decisional control. Younger age (p = 0.003), higher education (p < 0.001), and employment status (p = 0.046) were found to be associated with active or shared DCPs. Some 82% of patients were satisfied with the decision-making process, 35% of whom expressed wishes that did not match the actual decision-making process. Only 23% of patients thought they could be cured of their illness, and 47% thought that their treatment would "get rid of " their disease. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The decision-making processes are shared in the three models of DCPs in our cohort of French patients with advanced cancer. Further prospective studies are needed.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517000803

Voir la revue «Palliative & Supportive Care»

Autres numéros de la revue «Palliative & Supportive Care»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Decisional control preferences of patients wi...

Article | TRICOU, Colombe | Palliative & Supportive Care

OBJECTIVE: Understanding patients' decisional control preferences (DCPs) is important to improving the quality of care and the satisfaction of patients who have advanced cancer with their care. In addition to passive decisional co...

Decisional control preferences of patients wi...

Article indépendant | TRICOU, Colombe | Palliative & Supportive Care

OBJECTIVE: Understanding patients' decisional control preferences (DCPs) is important to improving the quality of care and the satisfaction of patients who have advanced cancer with their care. In addition to passive decisional co...

Cancer patients dying in the intensive care u...

Article | LEDOUX, Mathilde | JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE | n°5 | vol.21

BACKGROUND: In France, cancer has become the leading cause of death. Intensive care units (ICU) focus on survival, which may not be an appropriate setting to provide palliative care (PC) as needed by cancer patients and families. ...

De la même série

PACOPED QL : development and evaluation of th...

Article indépendant | RIERA-NEGRE, Laia | Palliative & Supportive Care | vol.23

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to validate the Palliative and Complex Chronic Pediatric Patients QoL Inventory (PACOPED QL), a new quality-of-life (QoL) assessment tool for pediatric palliative patients with complex chronic condition...

Communicating about the end of life : the pat...

Article indépendant | D'ANDRIA URSOLEO, Jacopo | Palliative & Supportive Care | vol.23

Patients with cancer are surviving longer, and therefore have more time both living as well as for end-of-life (EOL) planning (Bergenholtz et al. Reference Bergenholtz, Missel and Timm2020). Major concerns for dying patients relat...

Advance care planning readiness, barriers, an...

Article indépendant | HOWE, Rebecca | Palliative & Supportive Care | vol.23

OBJECTIVES: Advance care planning (ACP) supports communication and medical decision-making and is best conceptualized as part of the care planning continuum. Black older adults have lower ACP engagement and poorer quality of care ...

SAHD-10 : development and initial validation ...

Article indépendant | KREMEIKE, Kerstin | Palliative & Supportive Care | vol.23

OBJECTIVES: Wishes to hasten death (WTHDs) are common in patients with serious illness. The Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (SAHD) is a validated 20-item instrument for measuring WTHD. Two short versions have also been...

Teaching death, spirituality, and palliative ...

Article indépendant | CORPUZ, Jeff Clyde G. | Palliative & Supportive Care | vol.23

Teaching death, spirituality, and palliative care equips students with critical skills and perspectives for holistic patient care. This interdisciplinary approach fosters empathy, resilience, and personal growth while enhancing co...

Chargement des enrichissements...