Effect of a prediction tool and communication skills training on communication of treatment outcomes : a multicenter stepped wedge clinical trial (the SOURCE trial)

Article

VAN DE WATER, L. F. | KUIJPER, S. C. | HENSELMANS, I. | VAN ALPHEN, E. N. | KOOIJ, E. S. | CALFF, M. M. | BEEREPOOT, L. V. | BUIJSEN, J. | ESHUIS, W. J. | GEIJSEN, E. D. | HAVENITH, S. H. C. | HEESAKKERS, F. F. B. M. | MOOK, S. | MULLER, K. | POST, H. C. | RUTTEN, H. | SLINGERLAND, M. | VAN VOORTHUIZEN, T. | VAN LAARHOVEN, H. W. M. | SMETS, E. M. A.

BACKGROUND: For cancer patients to effectively engage in decision making, they require comprehensive and understandable information regarding treatment options and their associated outcomes. We developed an online prediction tool and supporting communication skills training to assist healthcare providers (HCPs) in this complex task. This study aims to assess the impact of this combined intervention (prediction tool and training) on the communication practices of HCPs when discussing treatment options. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter intervention trial using a pragmatic stepped wedge design (NCT04232735). Standardized Patient Assessments (simulated consultations) using cases of esophageal and gastric cancer patients, were performed before and after the combined intervention (March 2020 to July 2022). Audio recordings were analyzed using an observational coding scale, rating all utterances of treatment outcome information on the primary outcome-precision of provided outcome information-and on secondary outcomes-such as: personalization, tailoring and use of visualizations. Pre vs. post measurements were compared in order to assess the effect of the intervention. FINDINGS: 31 HCPs of 11 different centers in the Netherlands participated. The tool and training significantly affected the precision of the overall communicated treatment outcome information (p = 0.001, median difference 6.93, IQR (-0.32 to 12.44)). In the curative setting, survival information was significantly more precise after the intervention (p = 0.029). In the palliative setting, information about side effects was more precise (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: A prediction tool and communication skills training for HCPs improves the precision of treatment information on outcomes in simulated consultations. The next step is to examine the effect of such interventions on communication in clinical practice and on patient-reported outcomes. FUNDING: Financial support for this study was provided entirely by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society (UVA 2014-7000).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102244

Voir la revue «EClinicalMedicine, 64»

Autres numéros de la revue «EClinicalMedicine»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion