Laparoscopic pancreatic enucleation: how far should we go for parenchyma preservation? A study by the French National Association of Surgery

Archive ouverte

Pastier, Clément | de Ponthaud, Charles | Nassar, Alexandra | Soubrane, Olivier | Mazzotta, Alessandro | Souche, François-Régis | Brunaud, Laurent | Kianmanesh, Reza | Sulpice, Laurent | Schwarz, Lilian | Karam, Elias | Lermite, Emilie | Dokmak, Safi | Fuks, David | Gaujoux, Sébastien

Edité par CCSD ; Springer Verlag (Germany) -

International audience. Background: Pancreatic enucleation is indicated for selected patients and tumours with very low oncological risk to preserve a maximum of healthy pancreatic parenchyma. Minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation (MIPE) is increasingly performed. This study aims to assess the impact of tumor location and center experience on textbook outcomes (TBO) in patients undergoing MIPE.Methods: Retrospective nationwide multicentric cohort study including MIPE performed between 2010 and 2021. Tumor localization was classified as head/uncus, neck or body/tail (results are presented in this order). Centers were classified according to a mean volume of MI pancreatectomies performed per year: lower (< 5/year), intermediate (5 to 10/year) and higher volume (≥ 10/year). TBO was defined as meeting all 6 criteria: no postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH), no bile leak, no readmission, no mortality, and no severe morbidity.Results: 27 participating centers performed 200 MIPE located in head/uncus (n = 65, 33%), neck (n = 26, 13%) and body/tail (n = 109, 55%), 8% of them performed by robotic approach. Mortality reached 1.5% (n = 3). Head/uncus lesions were larger (p = 0.03), frequently BD-IPMN (p = 0.04), with significant longer operative time (p = 0.002). TBO achievement was high across all tumor locations (52 vs. 73 vs. 67%, p = 0.09) with higher PPH (p = 0.03) or bile leaks (p = 0.03) for head/uncus lesions. In multivariate analysis, overweight (OR 0.49), preoperative biopsy (OR 0.41) and head/uncus lesion (OR 0.34) were independently associated with lower TBO. No independent risk factor was found for POPF or severe morbidity. While expertise level influenced indications, with more cystic lesions (p = 0.002), larger tumors (p = 0.003), 3D use (p = 0.001), and head/uncus lesions (p = 0.04) in high volume centers, TBO was not significantly different (p = 0.45).Conclusions: MIPE is feasible with 1.5% mortality whatever its localization with higher morbidity for head/uncus lesions, justified by the will to avoid pancreaticoduodenectomy. High volume centers push the limits of MIPE without increasing morbidity.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Conversion during Minimally Invasive Left Pancreatectomy

Archive ouverte | de Ponthaud, Charles | CCSD

International audience. Objectives: To identify risk factors for conversion, develop a predictive Conversion Risk Score (CRS), and assess the association between conversion and severe postoperative complications. Ba...

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A propensity score matched multicentric comparative French study

Archive ouverte | Addeo, Pietro | CCSD

International audience. Background: Minimally invasive surgery has gained momentum for left pancreatic resections. However, debate remains about whether it has any advantage over open surgery for distal pancreatecto...

Defining Benchmark Outcomes for Distal Pancreatectomy: Results of a French Multicentric Study.

Archive ouverte | Durin, Thibault | CCSD

International audience. Objective: Defining robust and standardized outcome references for distal pancreatectomy (DP) by using Benchmark analysis.Background: Outcomes after DP are recorded in medium or small-sized s...

Chargement des enrichissements...