Allogenic bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cell–based therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial (RESPINE study)

Archive ouverte

Pers, Yves-Marie | Soler-Rich, Robert | Vadalà, Gianluca | Ferreira, Rosanna | Duflos, Claire | Picot, Marie-Christine | Herman, Fanchon | Broussous, Sylvie | Sánchez, Ana | Noriega, David | Ardura, Francisco | Alberca Zaballos, Mercedes | García, Verónica | Gordillo Cano, Virginia | González-Vallinas, Margarita | Denaro, Vicenzo | Russo, Fabrizio | Guicheux, Jérôme | Vilanova, Joan | Orozco, Lluís | Meisel, Hans-Jörg | Alfonso, Matias | Rannou, Francois | Maugars, Yves | Berenbaum, Francis | Barry, Frank | Tarte, Karin | Louis-Plence, Pascale | Ferreira-Dos-Santos, Guilherme | García-Sancho, Javier | Jorgensen, Christian

Edité par CCSD ; BMJ Publishing Group -

Trial registration number EudraCT 2017-002092-25/ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03737461.. International audience. To assess the efficacy of a single intradiscal injection of allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) versus a sham placebo in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).Methods: Participants were randomised in a prospective, double-blind, controlled study to receive either sham injection or intradiscal injection of 20 million allogeneic BM-MSC, between April 2018 and December 2022. The first co-primary endpoint was the rate of responders defined by improvement of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain of at least 20% and 20 mm, or improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of 20% between baseline and month 12. The secondary structural co-primary endpoint was assessed by the disc fluid content measured by quantitative MRI T2, between baseline and month 12. Secondary endpoints included pain VAS, ODI, the Short Form (SF)-36 and the minimal clinically important difference in all timepoints (1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months). We determined the immune response associated with allogeneic cell injection between baseline and 6 months. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded.Results: 114 patients were randomised (n=58, BM-MSC group; n=56, sham placebo group). At 12 months, the primary outcome was not reached (74% in the BM-MSC group vs 69% in the placebo group; p=0.77). The groups did not differ in all secondary outcomes. No SAE related to the intervention occurred.Conclusions: While our study did not conclusively demonstrate the efficacy of allogeneic BM-MSCs for LBP, the procedure was safe. Long-term outcomes of MSC therapy for LBP are still being studied.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Prescription trends in rheumatology: A look through pharmaco-epidemiology. L’évolution des prescriptions en rhumatologie : un regard à travers la pharmaco-épidémiologie

Archive ouverte | Pers, Yves-Marie | CCSD

International audience. The trend in rheumatology prescriptions reflects an ever-changing medicalfield, where scientificadvances and technological progress are reshaping clinical practices. Anti-inflammatory drugs(N...

[Is there an increasing frequency of osteoarthritis in young people?].

Archive ouverte | Pers, Yves-Marie | CCSD

International audience

Adipose derived stem cells for regenerative therapy in osteoarticular diseases

Archive ouverte | Pers, Yves-Marie | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...