Current state of knowledge of urology residents and fellows on the neuro-urological management of spina bifida patients in France. État des lieux des connaissances des internes et chefs de clinique d’urologie sur la prise en charge neuro-urologique des patients spina bifida en France

Archive ouverte

Lévy, Stéphan | Dequirez, Pierre-Luc | Mercier, Jérémy | Taha, Fayek | Goujon, Anna | Seguier, Denis | Mesnard, Benoît | Seizilles de Mazancourt, Emilien | Joussen, Guillaume | Margue, Gaëlle | Berchiche, William | Anastay, Vassili | Deleuze, Claire | Kaulanjan, Kevin | Cotte, Juliette | Peyrottes, Arthur | Gamé, Xavier | Peyronnet, Benoît

Edité par CCSD -

National audience. OBJECTIVE: To assess the current knowledge of French urology residents and fellows about neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and their management in patients with spina bifida. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A 7-question questionnaire, covering the responder’s experience and the various stages in the neuro-urological management of spina bifida, was drafted by an expert urologist. Responses were collected within 5days of being e-mailed to members of the Association française des urologues en formation (AFUF), and a descriptive analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Of the 448 members, 155 completed the questionnaire. Of the participants, 83.8% said they knew the definition of spina bifida, and 76.8% had already had to care for a spina bifida patient. Of the participants, 48.4% correctly estimated the number of spina bifida patients in France. Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction to look for and the specificities of management seemed to have been acquired by a majority of respondents (correct response rates of 70.7% and 75.4%, respectively), unlike the extra-urological aspects (53.9%), and the choice of examinations useful for the initial work-up and follow-up (55.8%). CONCLUSION: While the expected neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and the specificities of therapeutic management of spina bifida patients appear to be well known to urologists in training, knowledge of extra-urological symptoms and the choice of examinations could be improved. These results could be used to adjust the teaching given to French urologists in training on the urological management of spina bifida patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Third Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement Following Two Failures in Males: A Real‐World Multicenter Study

Archive ouverte | Meyer, Francois | CCSD

International audience. ABSTRACT Introduction The reoperation rate for artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) in men is about 25%, with poorer survival rates when reimplantation occurs after urethral erosion or infecti...

Uterine Transplant Optimization From a Preclinical Donor Model With Controlled Cardiocirculatory Arrest

Archive ouverte | Loiseau, Emma | CCSD

International audience. Background: Uterus transplantation from deceased donors offers a promising solution to the organ shortage, but optimal preservation methods are crucial for successful outcomes. Our primary ob...

Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

Archive ouverte | Cousin, Tiffany | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...